My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:30 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1993
Title
Western Area Power Administration-Issues for Discussion-Proposed SLCA/IP Firm Power Rate Adjustment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.- <br /> <br />D1240' <br /> <br />November 19. 1993 <br /> <br />Average Energy Used in Power Projections <br />and the Associated level of Risk <br /> <br />Issue <br /> <br />Western is examining some of the past practices and assumptions used to <br />develop long-range annual power projections for the CRSP and SLCA/IP power <br />repayment study. One item of interest is Western's use of average energy <br />and the associated level of risk associated with meeting long-term firm <br />contract obligations. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />. Previous years' studies have consistently assumed "average". or <br />mean. energy as the basis for definition of marketable resources for <br />long -term fi rm contract commitments and for long-term resource <br />availability. with some near-term adjustments. <br /> <br />. Based upon the simulated annual generation from CRSM modeling by <br />Reclamation. the annual energy probability distribution is <br />asymmetrlc and. in most years. is positively-skewed (i .e. the tail <br />extends to the right). For such a distribution. the better measure <br />of central tendency should be the median value. rather than the <br />average or mean. (The median is that value for which the probability <br />of occurrence is 50 percent.) With positively skewed projections. <br />in many years the average value is greater than the median value of <br />generation. implying an optimistic forecast (less-than-50 percent <br />chance of occurrence) of expected generation. For example. for WY <br />2000 the CRSM projections suggests an average generation of 6.235. <br />GWh, while the median value is 5.934 GWh. or a difference of 301 GWh <br />(4.8%). By WY 2010. this difference increases to 402 GWh (6.6%). <br />Further. based on the distribution of all simulations (or traces) of <br />annua 1 generati on for a pa rt i cul ar future year. thi s "average" <br />energy would occur only 40-45 percent of the time (See Figure 1). <br /> <br />Sensitivities <br /> <br />Due to the positively-skewed nature of the probability distribution for <br />the CRSM projections. average energy provides a less-than-50 percent <br />chance of occurrence of forecasted annua 1 energy. Western' s energy <br />projections (based on average values) would then be overestimated in power <br />repayment studies, based on the premise that projections should represent <br />a risk-neutral position (i .e., a 50-50 chance of occurrence in any future <br />year). This forecast would then underestimate expenses and overestimate <br />surpluses. imprudently reducing the associated firm power rate. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.