My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:30 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1993
Title
Western Area Power Administration-Issues for Discussion-Proposed SLCA/IP Firm Power Rate Adjustment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />01212 I, <br /> <br />D-R-A-I"-T <br /> <br />!l <br /> <br />P:\User\Thomas\95Rate\NonRp&y <br /> <br />O::trber 5. 1993 <br /> <br />monitoring or research deemed necessary to ensure that the GCD is <br />operating in a manner that protects and enhances the value of the <br />natural, recreational, and cultural resources of the Grand Canyon <br />National Park and the Glen Canyon Recreation Area, <br /> <br />. The release restrictions impact the SLCA!IP PRS,and the firm power rate ,in <br />several ways: <br /> <br />1, They make less energy and/or capacity available from GCD at <br />the time(s) it is needed to meet contractual load obligations. <br />Energy must be purchased from other suppliers to assure that <br />SLCA/IP customers receive what they are due. <br /> <br />.'2. Water is required to be released frem GCD at times when load <br />is low, resulting in foregone energy sales, or the sale of <br />energy for considerably less money than could have been <br />'realized ~f ~t were av?ilable at ~ ~ore oppqrtune time. <br /> <br />. 'The actual financial expense associated with the GeES-related releases is <br />the difference between operating expenses with those releases and what <br />operating expenses would be it no special constraints were placed on GCD. <br />This calculation is easier said than done. Dat.a from the actual, real- <br />time releases, incorporating the special studies, is readily available. <br />However, the operating expense which would be incurred without the special <br />releases is only a hypothetical figure. It is necessary to extrapolate, <br />using reasoned assumptions, what would have happened at GCD absent the <br />special studies. <br /> <br />. To determine the "Base Case", i.e.; what expenses would have been without <br />the special releases, Western uses the "peak-shaving" algorithm dev~loped <br />by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), with some refinements consistent <br />wi th the Power Resource Studies conducted by the GeES Power Resource <br />Committee, The peak'shaving algorithm follows the actual or projected <br />future firm load, and optimizes resources by utilizing the resource mix to <br />minimize the difference between load and resources for any particular <br />hour. <br /> <br />. Western examines impacts to firm operations only; nonfirm operations are <br />excl uded, <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />. Western has concluded that the following affected environmental expenses <br />(both historic and future) are nonreimbursable: <br /> <br />f, GCD EIS <br /> <br />G. Research Flows <br /> <br />H, Long-Term Monitoring <br /> <br />I, Phases I and II of the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies <br /> <br />J, Additional expense of power purchased due to interim flow <br />restrictions at GCD <br /> <br />~ These historic environmental costs that have been declared nonreimbursable <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.