Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />a~e charged with the responsibility of ensuring that the people <br />of Denver are provided with high quality drinking water. It is <br />submitted that EPA, in taking its recent action, has shirked that <br />statutory responsibility. The temptation of social meddling to <br />further political philosophies was apparently too great. In this <br />instance, the term "high quality" requires that the treatment faci- <br />lities be the most modern possi~le while being provided at the <br />cheapest possible cost to the consumer. This principle was used <br />in the design of the entire Foothills Project. <br /> <br />The third aspect of an adequate water supply concerns reliable <br />availability of the water supply and a consideration of "operational <br />constraints." This aspect is the most highly technical and often <br />the one most easily ignored by "instant experts" who presume to <br />substitute their judgment concerning the management of a water <br />utility system for that of professional engineers. In the case of <br />the Foothills project, numerous operational considerations such as <br />hydrologic analysis, power requirements, average and peak demands, <br />water supply distribution, sedimentation problems, Colorado Water <br />Law complexities, economic and engineering feasiblities, and winter <br />icing problems have been incorporated into the decision process <br />which designated the Foothills Project as the next component neces- <br />sary in the utility system for the Denver Metropolitan Area. <br /> <br />Of course, design considerations for utility services are not <br />static and vary with the demands of the times. As an example, be- <br />cause of modern national energy realities, Foothills was designed <br />as an element of the utility system which would minimize power <br />consumption. In fact, as presently designed, the Foothills filtra- <br />tion facility will actually generate a surplus of energy. The <br />plant will generate 11 million kilowatt hours (KWH) per year <br />initially and potentially 28 million KWH per year. The location <br />of the treatment plant will allow distribution by gravity and will <br />initially save 16 million KWH per year and ultimately 63 million <br />KWH per year in the existing system through elimination of pumping <br />costs. This will result in a $665,000.00 savings in the first <br />year Foothills is operational. This is just one example of the <br />many complex interrelationships that were considered before the <br />Foothills Project as proposed could be offered to the people of <br />Denver as the best solution as of a point in time for the problems <br />the utility faced in meeting increased demands for its services. <br />Here again, this complex balancing analysis was undertaken and <br />advanced after a tremendous amount of indepth analysis by world- <br />recognized experts in the field of utility planning and design. <br /> <br />Outlined above is a cursory examination of some of the complex <br />analyses that precipitated the determination that the Foothills <br />Treatment Complex was needed. Advanced design concepts were used <br />to insure that Foothills will supplement the presently existing <br />well-planned and integrated total water system for the metropoli- <br />tan area. It will serve in an ever-increasing manner to meet the <br /> <br />-4- <br />