Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />THE CITY OF AURORA NEEDS FOOTHILLS <br /> <br />Most often excluded from the public discussions of <br />Foothills is the fact that the City of Aurora has a current <br />critical need for Foothills. Aurora's only supply of raw <br />water is from the South Platte River. Aurora does not need <br />Foothills as an expansion for Aurora; it is a necessit for <br />Aurora to retire its deteriorationg, temporary 1verS1on <br />facility. <br /> <br />Aurora cannot tolerate an extended period of time of <br />not diverting water from the South Platte River (about a <br />one-month period is the maximum tolerable limit). within a <br />few years, Aurora will be compelled to build a new diversion <br />structure to ensure that its system is not rendered inoperable <br />for any time due to sedimentation and icing problems. It is <br />estimated that a structure similar in size to the Strontia <br />Springs Dam would be necessary to optimize diversion tech- <br />niques for utilization of Aurora's existing water rights. <br />See Exhibit No.5, which demonstrates the existing deteriorated <br />state of the Aurora diversion structure and tunnel, the <br />latter is to be repaired while Aurora utilizes the Foothills <br />diversion structure, tunnel and intertie. <br /> <br />METRO-DENVER NEEDS FOOTHILLS <br /> <br />The experience of the 1951 through 1957 period (the <br />Denver "Blue Line" period), is compelling evidence that the <br />immediate result of denial of the request for expansion of <br />water filtration facilities would be to stimulate the crea- <br />tion of new municipal and smaller water agencies in the <br />Denver metropolitan region which would rely on agricultural <br />water and bedrock aquifers for their entire water supply. At <br />present, over 900,000 people are served by the Denver Water <br />Department; by 2001, it is projected that the figure will be <br />approximately 1,500,000. As population migration continues <br />into the metropolitan area, the political pressure for an <br />adequate water supply will increase. Even EPA admits that <br />population growth will continue with or without Foothills. <br />In the past, people have been willing to pay the price for <br />the water they deem necessary for a pleasant environment and <br />there is no reason to assume that they will not continue to <br />do so. Therefore without Foothills, in order to respond to <br />the future population growth as predicted by the Denver <br />Regional Council of Governments (DRcOG), a scenario similar <br />to that which occurred during the "Blue Line" period will <br />return. Population increases which cannot be served by <br />Denver will turn to existing smaller entities and new special <br />purpose disricts and new municipalities will be created to <br />"tap" new and costly sources such as underground aquifers <br />and surface water currently used for agricultural purposes. <br />This type of water utility provision takes its toll in <br />greatly increased costs per unit and the attendant political <br />tensions between the various components of government ' <br />caused by competition for the resource and disparity in <br /> <br />-19- <br />