<br />-
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />generation.
<br />
<br />We think the Corps of Engineers and the
<br />
<br />'".28 '':1IIfi'.
<br />1,"_'1.'
<br />"/l:
<br />',;X'
<br />.'/:.
<br />.'
<br />
<br />12
<br />
<br />space,bui1ding"pe~iOd'AUgU8t throughDec~~:
<br />
<br />Because of '
<br />
<br />. :<"J,' ~. .;.
<br />
<br />" '
<br />
<br />.,...... '. '.'
<br />
<br />'~,"t i" !': .
<br />
<br />,'.'Ii,
<br />. ''l;--'
<br />'.>J....I<.:.
<br />
<br />'-::~'t.,
<br />
<br />'l!'
<br />,~,
<br />'..
<br />
<br />Bureau of Reclamation have done a good job of considering
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />'these,..differen~,c()ncei-ns''''and''bf';anitli~1~~~~;'.iif't~~t:~iio~~~a
<br />0"" '
<br />- '"
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />alternative
<br />
<br />oper~ting plans on thesecon'cerns.
<br />" . ,~ '..' '.'1', ",...,~ ,:.0-.\.
<br />. :. ~.'-' J' I .' . " " _
<br />We are pleased that all alternatives attempt to
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />}.'::';
<br />'.",~
<br />'* '
<br />~"
<br />
<br />5
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />restrict releases to no greater. than 28,000 cfs, which is
<br />
<br />','
<br />1i<. .
<br />
<br />~<:~
<br />". .::(
<br />,.,~
<br />~.i:~
<br />-'\~
<br />. '"S$'
<br />
<br />~,:.
<br />"~ ,.~
<br />, .:j-.
<br />
<br />11 would be limited to 28,000 efsunder all alternatives' during"t e';:
<br />
<br />. T ~ ,
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />essentially the non-damaging discharge, as long as possible,
<br />
<br />.~:- ~"
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />. . .~, ,. '. . "'.:.'- -.:-(':' ':~'(\:"","'. '" ',., .~:,;"04; ',,-_ "~~, -,. : -l '., -._'J..- '.':,':'.",..' .,' _._.. ..... , .....::~.:.,;:. ::':".
<br />, . 15' December 'period ~pr6dl1ces' the 'highest 'incidence of releases " .. '
<br />~~ ,r:" .~~:.
<br />" ." " -' .....'
<br />16 in excess of' normal based on the historical' periOd of record."
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />'-"
<br />
<br />1 storage requirment'of 5',35,millioi1~acre feet, tlle.same AS"
<br />" -' ,'-.,. . '!" _'- ....;.. ..,.... ,"'\,or " ,'. '~": . ~ . .' .'~ .'. ','. "-."";- "",-
<br />theprese~t . requirement:;' provides the most balanced ' operatinq'J ~
<br />"oIi~
<br />
<br />8
<br />
<br />consistent with the other basic criteria in effect 'for each
<br />
<br />9
<br />
<br />alternative. This compares ,with a target release of 40,000,
<br />
<br />10
<br />
<br />cfs under the present regulations.
<br />
<br />Furthermore, it releases.
<br />
<br />'~.:.."'''~-'
<br />
<br />13
<br />
<br />the requirement of having the maximum amount of flood space
<br />
<br />14
<br />
<br />available on January 1 of any year, this August through
<br />
<br />.....-..:., . '..
<br />
<br />,.
<br />
<br />17
<br />
<br />We have analyzed the economic evaluation of
<br />
<br />18
<br />
<br />alternative plans and feel that alternative 1, with a January
<br />
<br />19
<br />
<br />20
<br />
<br />21 plan considering all purposes. Only Al terna ti ve 9, with a
<br />
<br />22
<br />
<br />slightly different staged release pattern, prOduces higher
<br />
<br />.:.~~
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />':~
<br />"
<br />
<br />_ ',' ,"-,' _~, ~"'. ~~.. ',,'. "".;, :;,..fi!:..'
<br />overall net benefits than Alternative l,,'~nd then by only.."",' "
<br />. . __,', :.:'~ -. :' . ."',-..< ','. " .::~.. '. ". .." ,.- _. ~;., .....'....,' t.... . '. .,..~~4,~.~~:~ ~'-;j:.
<br />$3,000 annually.'Based on the comparative economic data , ".... '"",,
<br />
<br />23
<br />
<br />24
<br />
<br />25 presented, we see no significant flood control advantage to
<br />
<br />r c; 11 11,.,,, "t:.."
<br />
<br />.,:.
<br />
|