My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03252
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03252
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:26 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/16/1996
Title
Biological Opinion Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;, <br /> <br />,~l~) <br />-' ~.t;-., <br /> <br />, <br />-" <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />a 1275 cms flow. More important are the velocity in the primary eddies close to the terrilories. <br />Based on the prediction that debris fans will not be overtopped by a 1275 cms flow, velocities <br />on the inundated surface of the reattachment bars (substrate for territory vegetation), are <br />, anticipated to range from 0.33 to 0.84 mls. Velocities of this range may scour the face of the <br />reattachment bar but are unlikely to scour the rear portions of the bar or the cohesive silt <br />sediments. Predications are reinforced by observations of 6 return current channel marshes that <br />agraded slightly but were not scoured after the 1980 spill. <br /> <br />? <br />1':' <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />4. Assess the relative proportions of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates in the southwestern <br />willow flycatcher diet: As no detailed diet study has been conducted on the southwestern willow <br />flycatcher in Grand Canyon, examination of previous southwestern willow flycatcher food habits, <br />Grand Canyon invertebrate studies, and interviews with biologists found the species feeds on a <br />number of insects, other invertebrates and some plant matter. Aquatic invertebrates such as <br />snails and Tabanidae larvae have reported elsewhere, and similar taxa may contribute to the food <br />base of the species here. Because the test flow will be conducted in late March, invertebrate <br />populations will have opportunity to repopulate or even increase because of renewed plant vigor <br />and regrowth. Also, because most insects have not emerged at time of the test flow, while there <br />may be some reduction in fossorial species, most terrestrial invertebrate groups are not <br />anticipated to diminish. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />f~ <br />,) <br /> <br />If the test flow is successful, proposed critical habitat should be enhanced as the fluvial processes <br />restore sediment from channel bottoms to the nearshore and areas above the mean high interim <br />flow. The duration and magnitude of the test flow was devised in order to create enough <br />velocity and force to move sand-sized sedimenland deposit that sediment before it has traveled <br />too far downstream or the flow has eroded return current attachment bars and other substrates <br />of woody riparian in the upper portion of the Grand Canyon where sediment supply is limited. <br />The physical and biological features and constituent elements of the proposed critical habitat <br />would be benefited in the long-term (in this case, perhaps 1 or 2 years after the test flow) while <br />there might be short-term adverse effects due to high flows to some of the constituent elements <br />through temporary reduction in cover near or habitat for terrestrial insects. These short-term <br /> <br /> <br />Summarizing, the test flow will be conducted before territorial southwestern willow flycatchers <br />have returned to Grand Canyon habitats so there will be no direct loss of nests or young. The <br />timing of the flow approximates a hydrograph designed to restore a more natural dynamic <br />process to the Grand Canyon ecosystem. Loss of woody riparian vegetation is not expected at <br />nesting territories as the quantity and duration of flows do not exceed a level previously <br />experienced that did not scour those habitats. Some loss of return current channel wetlands. <br />marshes, and understory at nesting territories is anticipated if the test flow is successful; <br />however, while not anticipated to reduce appreciable the breeding, nesting, and forage value of <br />that habitat, this loss is unquantified. Some insect and other invertebrate populations that are <br />a food resource for the southwestern willow flycatcher might be reduced immediately following <br />the flow but might increase later in the season. Whether territories are more susceptible to <br />brown-headed cowbird parasitism after the test flow is also not quantified. <br /> <br />Biological and Conference Opinions Glen Canyon BeachlHabilal.Building Flows 2116196 <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.