Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Population Dynamics <br /> <br />Population size: Current estimates for total numbers of remaining southwestern willow <br />flycatchers are 500 or fewer nesting pairs rangewide (Unitt 1987. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />1995b). Approximately 100 territorial males are estimated to occur in southern California, with <br />most nesting groups occurring in four drainages (Whitfield 1993. Griffith and Griffith 1994. <br />Holmgren, written communication). Approximately 119 territorial males were located at 19 sites <br />spread over 11 drainages during statewide surveys in Arizona in 1994 (Sferra et aI. 1995). <br />Approximately 120 territorial males were located at 18 sites spread over 8 drainages in New <br />Mexico during statewide surveys in 1994 (Parker and Hull 1994. Maynard 1995). A small <br />number of territorial males (S 5) has been documented in both southern Utah and southwestern <br />Colorado during 1993. 1994, and 1995 surveys. However. breeding has not been confirmed in <br />those states (Sogge 1995a, K. McDonald, Utah Division of Natural Resources. personal <br />communication, T. Ireland. Service. Colorado. written communication). Rangewide, 77 percent <br />of the locations with flycatchers are comprised of five or fewer territorial males. <br /> <br />Population stabilitv: Southwestern willow flycatcher breeding populations are extremely small <br />and unstable. The Service believes that at current population levels. and with continuing threats, <br />extinction of this species is foreseeable. Southwestern willow flycatchers are absent from many' <br />areas previously occupied or are present in reduced numbers (Hubbard 1987, Unitt 1987, Sogge <br />et aI. 1993, Sogge and Tibbitts 1994. Muiznieks et aI. 1994, Sferra et aI. 1995). Former <br />populations in Arizona on the lower Salt River. Santa Cruz River. and lower Colorado River <br />near Yuma have been extirpated. Small groups of one to seven willow flycatcher territories <br />have been detected on the Santa Maria River. lower San Pedro River, Verde River, upper Tonto <br />Creek. upper Salt River, upper Gila River. Little Colorado River, and the Colorado River in <br />Marble Canyon (Sogge et aI. 1993, Sogge and Tibbitts 1994. Muiznieks et aI. 1994, Sferra er <br />al. 1995). <br /> <br />Nesting groups monitored on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon have declined since <br />monitoring began in 1984 (Sogge 1995c). A similar trend has been observed in the Verde <br />Valley at.Clarlcdale where four territorial males were first observed in 1992. In 1993. two pairs <br />were present, one nest was documented and contained a single cowbird nestling (Muiznielcs er <br />01. 1994). In 1994. two pairs and one unpaired male were present. Two nests were found. one <br />of which successfully fledged two flycatchers. the other fledged a single cowbird (Sferra et aI. <br />1995). Data from 1995 indicate that two unpaired males occupied the Clarlcdale site (Sogge <br />1995a), however extensive monitoring efforts were not possible due to landowner restrictions <br />on access to the site. <br /> <br />In California along the Kern River, Whitfield (1993) documented a precipitous decline in the <br />total flycatcher population (44 to 27 pairs) from 1989 to 1993. During that same period cowbird <br />parasitism rates between 50 and 80 percent were also documented (Whitfield 1993). A cowbird <br />trapping program initiated in 1992 has reduced cowbird parasitism rates to S 10 percent and <br />appears to have stabilized population numbers at Kern River at 32 to 34 pairs (Whitfield 1994). <br /> <br />Biological aod Conference Opinions Glen Caoyon BcachlHabitat-Building Flows 2116196 <br /> <br />10 <br />