Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0009o~ <br /> <br />-34- <br /> <br />TOOLS AND INITIATIVES FOR 1980 AND BEYOND: AN AGENDA <br /> <br />Although the preferred scenario of Euture energy production cannot be <br />identified precisely at this time, it is clear that the magnitude of this <br />preferred scenario would be substantially above the low scenario identified here, <br />probably close to the medium scenario in terms of total energy production. <br />As a result, it is further clear::that additional resources and statutory <br />authority would be required in order to accommodate and mitigate that preferred <br />scenario. While it is a policy judgment whether Colorado should achieve a <br />preferred level of energy production above the low scenario identified here, <br />with appropriate additional resources and statutory authority Colorado could <br />live with the preferred level of energy development. Further, the achievement <br />'ot tn~s pref~red level would be responsive to national energy needs in an <br />orderly fashion. But the achievement of this preferred level would have to <br />bring with it the necessary resources and statutory authority to mitigate <br />as many undesirable consequences of rapid energy production in Colorado as <br />can be achieved. Colorado should not support the growth of energy production.k <br />above the low scenario toward a preferred level of production until these ~ <br />mitigation resources and strategies are in place. The following possible <br />initiatives suggest the types of actions which may be required if Colorado <br />is to be::adequately prepared to deal with fvture energy production. <br /> <br />Department of Local Affairs Suggestions for Possible Tools and Initiatives <br /> <br />Implementation of a preferred development program depends to a considerable <br />extent upon the ability of state and local governments to exercise some ./ <br />control over their own destiny. Presently, Colorado's destiny is largely <br />determined by private sector and Federal government initiatives. <br /> <br />Colorado must exercise some means of gaining control over the state's <br />destiny. This could be accomplished by the establishment of facility-siting <br />law which addresses both the environmental-social and economic impacts and <br />their ultimate prevention or mitigation. It could also be accomplished <br />through the development of mechanisms to allow for the sharing of tax-revenues <br />at the local level. There is a need for the generation of additional revenues. <br />This might be accomplished through impact-assistance legislation at the <br />Federal level, increases in the state severance tax, mandatory industrial <br />cost-internalization, and implementation of existing revenue-generation <br />capacity at the local level, such as sales tax increases. There is also <br />a need to provide local officials with the mechanisms to allow them to <br />exercise existing authorities to the fullest. These might include land-use <br />plans and strategies, zoning programs, and conditional use strategies. There <br />is also a need to develop impact development standards which provide guidelines <br />to address optimum community development criteria. <br /> <br />Department of Highways Suggestions for Possible Tools and Initiatives <br /> <br />The Colorado Department of Highways firmly believes that the costs of / <br />mitigating transportation impacts that are directly attributable to energy <br />resource development activities should be the responsibility of that economic . <br />sector. There are several potential means available for accomplishing that <br />end. The first would be an increase in the current state severance tax to <br />a level capable of generating the required revenass and earmarked those <br />revenues specifically for highway improvements. The second would be the <br />