Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Oj0352 <br /> <br />- 20 - <br /> <br />Health Impacts <br /> <br />Air Quality Evaluation--Substantial air quality impacts could occur <br />from oil shale construction activitie~, uranium mining and power plant <br />construction and operation. However, it is felt that these problems would <br />probably be in compliance with ambient air and emission standards if it is <br />assumed that appropriate control technology is used and if it is assumed <br />that there are no siting problems. All other air quality impacts are minimal <br />or moderate. It is recommended that all major potential problems and <br />substantial impacts identified be evaluated further. <br /> <br />Air Quality - Oil Shale--Oil shale plant operation at 360,000 barrels/ <br />day by 1990 could cause violations of the existing Federal PSD standard for <br />Sulfur Dioxide (502) for the Flattops Wilderness Area located in the White <br />River National Forest. Given best available data, the PSD increment covld <br />be exceeded by almost a factor of 2. It is assumed that there will be <br />minimal problems with oil shale siting with respect to any local impacts. <br />E . ns to this assumption could be possible and ~be-a-further COll'>L:0 <br />o devel~ment. Subs~antial.air ?uality impact ~otal Suspended P~~~i~ulate <br />(TSP) l~lS could ex~st dur~ng o~l shale construct~on, but these-impacts <br />~lll ~4 ably be controlled and be in compliance with standards if it is <br />assumed that there are no siting problems. <br /> <br />Air Quality - Coal--Localized violations of the existing annual and <br />24-hour TSP standard could occur for the coal production projected for 1990. <br />This is primarily due to the close proximity of the coal mining operations <br />and a possibility that some collective impacts may occur. <br /> <br />Air Quality - Oil and Gas-- minimal air quality impacts from oil and <br />gas resource development are anticipated. <br /> <br />Air Quality - Uranium--Substantial TSP impacts, which will probably <br />be controlled, have been identified for uranium mining operations. <br /> <br />Air Quality - Secondary Impacts--Major potential problems associated <br />with the growth of Grand Junction, Rifle, and Craig have been identified. <br />All three communities by 1990 would exceed the 25,000 population figure <br />used for TSP non-attainment designation. Violations of the annual and <br />24-hour TSP standards would be probable. The population increase in <br />Grand Junction would require that the Colorado State Implementation Plan <br />(SIP) be revised to develop additional control measures. Also, potential <br />problems with increased automotive generated carbon monoxide (CO) emissions <br />in Grand Junction would exist. Violations of the a-hour CO standard would <br />be possible. <br /> <br />Power plant construction and operation could substantially impact air <br />quality levels. However, if proposed new technology use is assumed, it is <br />probable that power plant activity in northwest Colorado would be in <br />compliance with environmental standards and regulations. <br /> <br />1 <br />Cr <br /> <br />Water Quality Evaluation--No major potential problems associated with <br />energy development have been identified for water quality impact, assuming <br />appropriate control technology is used. <br />