Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOO:H ~ <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br />The fact that there is a projected increase in energy production for <br />a planning and management region does not disclose the role which separate <br />counties will play. There is a vast difference in the rates of expected <br />increased energy production within. these regions, as shown below: <br /> <br /> PROJECTED TOTAL ENERGY PRODUCTION <br /> AS PER CENT OF 1978 BASE LEVEL <br /> FOR THE HIGH SCENARIO <br /> 1985 1990 <br />Re~ion 10 174' 214 , <br />Delta (~ 4l,g~ <br />Gunnison . 235 414 <br />Montrose 103 107 <br />San Miguel 301 302 <br />Re~ion 11 274 515 <br />Garfield ~~ ~> <br />Mesa <br />Moffat 236 397 <br />Rio Blanco 222 394 <br />Re~ion 12 232 407 <br />Jackson 215 364 <br />Pitkin 235 414 <br />Routt 235 414 <br /> <br />Of course, there is also a difference in the projected levels of future energy <br />production for these counties, which becomes another means ~f identifying <br />those counties likely to receive the largest impact from energy development. <br />Shown below is a list of the counties having the largest levels of total <br />energy production in 1990 at the high scenario: <br />