Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(lJuB0. <br /> <br />-6- <br /> <br />actual levels of energy production which will occur in Colorado through the <br /> <br />year 1990. Short of a national emergency, Colorado will probably not be called <br /> <br />upon to deliver simultaneously all of the high scenario levels of production. <br /> <br />Likewise, short of some major technological breakthroughs and/or drastic changes <br /> <br />in personal and corporate energy usage, the low levels of production will <br /> <br />probably be exceeded. The medium scenario, then becomes an intermediate level <br /> <br />of production. It should be emphasized that this medium scenario is in no way <br /> <br />a preferred level of development. A series. of adjustments must be made in the <br /> <br />individual levels of energy production for oil shale, coal, uranium, and oil <br /> <br />and gas to fit the technologies likely to be available, the environmental <br /> <br />consequences of development, and the ability of communities to absorb the <br /> <br />population implicit in energy development. <br /> <br />A glance at recent energy produduction in Colorado indicates that its loca- <br /> <br />tion and impact has n~t been uniform throughout the state. Rather, an increase ~ <br /> <br />in total energy production of 49.8 percent fro~o l~mostlY occurred ' <br /> <br />through increased production in the following energy types (with associated <br /> <br />percentage increases over~ne same <br />/' <br /> <br />ti~ <br /> <br />106 percent "- <br />90 percent <br />10 percent <br /> <br />----- <br /> <br />If this total increase in ener <br /> <br /> <br />- . <br /> <br />~on for the state is viewed in terms of <br /> <br />where it occurred, then relatively few planning and management regions accounted <br /> <br />for the major share of production: <br /> <br />Planning and Management <br />Region <br /> <br />'7. Share of <br />1974 Total <br />State Energy <br />Production <br /> <br />% Share of <br />1978 Total <br />State Energy <br />Production <br /> <br />2 <br />(10 <br />11 <br />f~rZ <br /> <br />4.4 % <br />12L8 <br />30.9 <br />18..1 <br /> <br />2.3 % <br />2 .0-:;:, <br />30.9 <br />20.50 <br /> <br />A look at projected future energy production for Colorado reinforces thia ~ <br /> <br />this trend of concentration within a few regions of the state. Such geographical <br />