My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03206
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:11 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:36:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.399
Description
Ute Water Conservancy District
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
6/1/1962
Author
Western Engineers
Title
Supplemental Engineering Report-Proposed Water System - June 1962
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />'. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />OJ0855 <br /> <br />to those encountered by the Olifton District. This was done <br />with the help and advice of Clifton District officials. As a <br />result of this advice, Ute contracts provided for payment of <br />tap fees in cash, or with a down payment and note for the <br />balance to be paid within a fixed period. Oontracts also pro- <br />vide for payment for water when it becomes available. <br /> <br />Other important factors which caused potential Clifton <br />users to hesitate about making connections immediately, were <br />psychological. The Oontractor had many flaws in the system <br />including a leak in the Colorado River crossing as well as at <br />many less critical locations. The district has had to secure <br />replacement couplings and fittings for many of the original <br />ones because of failures, and recently the filter plant required <br />alterations because of improper operation. All these condi- <br />tions are being corrected, but the attitude of a large percent <br />of the users toward immediate use of the water is understand- <br />able. <br /> <br />It is the considered opinion of this writer that the rate <br />of water use in the Olifton District is not particularly high <br />compared to other similar systems, and should not require an <br />explanation. It is pointed out that the large user, whose need <br />is the greatest, is normally among the first to take water. The <br />small users are more reluctant to connect to the system. The <br />fact that a high tax levy may be applied may exert influence <br />on the large owner with property having high assessed values, <br />but it has little influence on low value property which may be <br />assessed at a few hundred dollars. As indicated by the average <br />assessed valuation of property and according to general know- <br />ledge of the area, an unusually large percent of old age pen- <br />sioners and low income families on small acreages are located <br />within the Clifton District. Many of these are eager to take <br />water but are unable to finance the necessary improvements <br />required for putting it to use. <br /> <br />Vinelands Water District <br /> <br />The Vinelands Water District is located near Palisade and <br />purchases Palisade water. It has been referred to as an example <br />of converting to a piped system from hauled water service. <br />According to the report, average use increased from 2200 gallons <br />to 8285 gallons per month per user. This is discounted as a <br />typical example of rural useage for two main reasons: <br />(1) lower water rates and (2) high pressures. However, in the <br />case of the Vineland District, the outside rates for Palisade, <br /> <br />- 21 - <br /> <br />~,..., <br />"- ,,,",, ~~: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.