My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03203
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:36:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8021
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Western States Water Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/10/1995
Author
Western States Water
Title
Western States Water 1995 - Issues 1082-1121
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o 0 I :J 3'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />THE <br /> <br />OS <br />l:lIO <br /> <br />ER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />October 13, l-ECEIVED <br />Issue No. 11'" <br /> <br />ft OCT 1 6 1995 <br /> <br />ta, Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board <br />recycled paper <br />conserves water <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201/942 East 7145 So, / Midvale, Utah 84047 / (801) 561-5300 / FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />Chairman - Larry Anderson; Executive Director - Craig Bell; Editor - Tony Willardson; Typist - Alona Banks <br /> <br />CONGRESSIONAL UPDATE <br />Budget Reconciliation/EPA Appropriations <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />On October 12, the House Budget Committee <br />approved a reconciliation bill, but Chairman John Kasich <br />(R-OH) says some changes may be made before it gets <br />to the House floor (WSW #1114). Next, it goes to the <br />House Rules Committee. The individual committees are <br />responsibie for preparing and reporting different parts of <br />the package, which will be considered together by each <br />House. Potential amendments are limited (WSW #1115). <br />Once approved by the House and Senate, a joint <br />conference committee will meet to resolve differences <br />between the two bills. Of note, no language regarding <br />the sale of federal power marketing administrations is in <br />the Senate bill (WSW #1116). <br /> <br />On September 27, the Senate passed an FY96 <br />appropriations bill providing $5.66B for the EPA. This <br />represents a $1B reduction (15%) from FY95 levels, but <br />a 16% increase over the House bill's $4.89B. The cuts <br />come primarily from Superfund and sewage treatment <br />programs. Last year's funding bill earmarked $800M for <br />publicly-owned treatment works construction in specific <br />cities...all of which are eliminated in the FY96 bill, which <br />would appropriate $1.5B for SRFs to finance wastewater <br />treatment facilities across the Nation. These monies are <br />to be distributed among the states according to an <br />equitable formula. Also, action was taken to prevent <br />EPA from access to these funds to finance other EPA <br />activities. The bill authorizes grants totaling $2.34B to <br />help states meet environmental mandates. This is a <br />$310M increase over last year, and represents 40% of <br />EPA's total budget (WSW # 1115). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Senate bill expressly includes a limitation against <br />EPA mandating car pooling, one of the "riders" on the <br />House appropriations bill. Two other riders were <br />modified. One prohibits EPA from mandating centralized <br />car inspection and maintenance facilities. The second <br /> <br />rider suspends EPA's veto authority over the Army <br />Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation decisions. Two <br />other riders related to drinking water were combined in <br />the Senate bill. They would prohibit drinking water <br />standards for arsenic, radon, sulfates, ground water <br />disinfection, and other substances until the Safe Drinking <br />Water Act is reauthorized. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENT <br />Endangered Species Act <br /> <br />Efforts to reauthorize the Endangered Species Act <br />may be accelerating. The House Resource Committee <br />adopted Chairman Young's (R-AK) bill, H.R. 2275, on <br />Thursday, October 12. The 27-22 vote essentially <br />followed party lines. The so-called Young-Pombo bill <br />was criticized in several particulars by authors of <br />competing bills, Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ) and Wayne <br />Gilchrest (R-MD), and others (WSW #1116). However, <br />only three Republicans voted against the bill. Majority <br />staff assert that the Young-pombo bill incorporates <br />nearly 80% of the recommendations of the Western <br />Governors' Association. However, they have not <br />claimed an endorsement. <br /> <br />Among its major changes, H.R. 2275 would <br />reportedly: (1) eliminate protection of a species habitat <br />and reverse the Sweet Home decision (WSW #11 03); <br />(2) give states a greater role in listing and protection <br />efforts; and (3) ease requirements for protection of <br />imperiled species prior to full recovery. The bill also <br />eases regulations of hydroelectric dams for species, <br />particularly salmon. Indeed, Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) <br />claimed the bill would end protection for the Columbia <br />River salmon by narrowing the definition of an <br />endangered species. While clearing the first major <br />hurdle on the House side, the fate of reauthorization <br />legislation is still quite uncertain. A bill similar in several <br />respects to the Young-Pombo bill was introduced earlier <br />this year by Senator Slade Gorton (R-WA), but no action <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.