My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03203
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:36:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8021
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Western States Water Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
2/10/1995
Author
Western States Water
Title
Western States Water 1995 - Issues 1082-1121
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />EP 0 81995STATESI'f DIR <br /> <br />oIoredo Waler ~~c <br />nsarvation Board F <br /> <br />WATER ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />September I, 1995 <br />Issue No. 1111 <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />recycled paper <br />conseI'1{fs water <br />'j <br /> <br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suile A-20l /942 East 7145 So. / Midvale, Utah 84047 / (801) 561-5300 / FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />Chairman - Larry Anderson; Executive Director - Craig Bell; Editor - Craig Bell; Typist - Alona Banks <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES <br />Colorado River Basin - Lower Basin Agreement <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Diverse interests in the lower Colorado River Basin <br />have 60 days to reach an agreement on their future use <br />of the river. After that, the Department of Interior has <br />said it may proceed with promulgation of proposed rules <br />drafted last summer relating to transfers in the Lower <br />Basin (WSW #1051). Following preliminary meetings <br />involving the seven basin states and ten Indian tribes <br />affected, a technical committee (TC) was formed of state <br />officials and water users' representatives to seek a <br />regional solution to the Lower Basin's problems. Before <br />concluding its efforts, without an agreement, the TC <br />prepared a list of guiding principles and essential <br />elements for any regional solution (WSW #1084). No <br />solution has yet been reached. <br /> <br />In its July 1995 newsletter, the Southern California <br />Water Committee included a series of invited <br />contributions from some of the principal Lower Basin <br />interests. The Committee representn !~ca.! and <br />municipal governments, water and irrigation districts, <br />and farming and business interests. Noting that Lower <br />Basin water supplies are approaching full use, Bureau of <br />Reclamation Commissioner Dan Beard suggests that 75 <br />years after most Colorado River Basin state governors <br />endorsed an interstate compact, "...we must again ask <br />what steps can be taken to ensure the river will meet <br />contemporary and future water needs...." He adds, "The <br />federal government has a role in this process, but the <br />states must ultimately lead it. Indeed, to accomplish true <br />consensus on what steps should be implemented, and <br />how, the process must include...all stakeholders...." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Jerry Zimmerman, Executive Director of the Colorado <br />River Board of California, points out that discussions <br />have focused on improved reservoir and river <br />management, interstate water transfers, water banking <br />and more flexible accounting for water use. He states, <br /> <br />"Although some are of the opinion that certain of these <br />elements are more acceptable and more important than <br />others, I firmly believe that each...in some form, must be <br />components of the 'Regional Solution' package...." E. <br />Thornton Ibbetson, a director of the Metropolitan Water <br />District of Southern California, observes, "Consensus <br />often is more easily talked about than accomplished, <br />particularly among water users. Yet...one fact remains <br />unchanged: Each entitlement holder has a very specific, <br />and individual, need for seeking a regional water supply <br />solution." According to Patricia Mulroy, General <br />Manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, "The <br />problem is political, and the result of an institutional <br />deficiency in the Lower Basin.... Unlike our neighbors in <br />the Upper Basin states, we have no multi-state regional <br />forum that allows us to work together to manage this <br />resource...." Southern Nevada has proposed "limited" <br />state-to-state marketing and multi-state water banking as <br />the key to stability for its water supplies. <br /> <br />Rita Pearson, Director of the Arizona Department of <br />VVatei Resources, declare-s that Aiizona has clearly <br />demonstrated its commitment to meeting its future water <br />supply needs. "Arizona responded by crafting a long- <br />term water policy centered on conservation and on <br />promoting the use of renewable surface water <br />supplies...investing in the construction of the $4.4 billion <br />Central Arizona Project.... The state also enacted its <br />innovative Groundwater Management Code... [which) <br />imposes aggressive conservation requirements and <br />promotes the use of reclaimed water and effluent. <br />Arizona is experiencing rapid population growth and...will <br />fully utilize its annual Colorado River entitlement by <br />2040." David "Sid" Wilson, General Manager, Central <br />Arizona Water Conservation District, points out, "Arizona <br />has no intention or relinquishing any of its long-term <br />entitlements to Colorado River supplies.... Arizona's <br />share..provides the long-term supply surety we require <br />while enabling us to reduce serious overdrafting of the <br />state's ground water. Arizona has made long-term <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.