Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />(\ ,. ., '"" I "'5 /'. :' _ {J . 0.. <br />,j!5!c}'Y' ~ <br />WESTERN <br /> <br />. ---- <br /> <br />STATE <br />WATE <br /> <br /> <br />RECEIV&D <br />Issue No. 1105 <br />JUl ~1995 <br /> <br />CoIor'-'" <br />onserva~a,.d <br />i. <br />r~cycled paper <br />crrerves water <br /> <br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201/942 East 7145 So. / Midvale, Utah 84047 / (801) 561-5300 / FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />Chairman - Larry Anderson; Executive Director - Craig Bell; Editor - Craig Bell; Typist - Alona Banks <br /> <br />CONGRESSIONAL UPDATE <br /> <br />Grazing Reform <br /> <br />On July 19, the Senate Energy and Natural <br />Resources Committee voted 11-8 to report S. 852 and <br />codify current Bureau of Land Management grazing <br />policies. The bill would also change Interior's plan for <br />~grazing reform, due to take effect on August 21. The <br />~ measure does raise grazing fees, but not as much as <br />the Administration has proposed. Further, it would give <br />more authority to local resource advisory boards. <br />Interior is also directed to establish uniform standards <br />and guidelines for grazing on a state or regional level <br />with the help of state agriculture departments and land- <br />grant universities. <br /> <br />Regulatory Reform <br /> <br />The Senate continues to debate a comprehensive <br />regulatory reform bill (S. 343), as the majority leaderShip <br />has twice failed to muster enough votes to invoke <br />closure. As amended, the bill's new requirements apply <br />only to rules with an annual economic cost of over <br />$100M, and a ten-year sunset provision was added. <br />Key amendments include: a requirement that health, <br />safety and environmental rules be prioritized; an <br />exemption for bills proposed before April 1; a statement <br />that nothing in the bill is intended to delay regulations <br />affecting human health and safety threats; and an open <br />procedures requirement for public accountability. Last <br />March, the House passed its version of a <br />comprehensive regulatory reform package (H.R. 9). <br />~ However, on July 18, the House Government Reform <br />Committee approved a supplemental bill (H.R. 944) by <br />/a 39-7 vote, with strong bipartisan support. <br /> <br />Rescissions <br /> <br />On July 12, a frustrated Senate Majority Leader Bob <br /> <br />Dole (R-KS) exclaimed, "I'm finished with this bill." The <br />prospects for a new agreement on a rescissions <br />package are now uncertain. Dole had hoped to finally <br />act on H.R. 1944, a packageof$16.3 billion in spending <br />cuts, but continuing minority demands to debate <br />amendments to restore funding for various programs led. <br />Dole to drop the bill. Last month, President Clinton <br />vetoed a similar bill. H.R. 1944 would cut funding for <br />many federal programs, including a Safe Drinking Water <br />Act revolving loan fund (WSW #1 099 and #1085). <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENT <br /> <br />Endangered Species Act <br /> <br />The Senate Environment and Public Works <br />Subcommittee on Drinking Water, Fisheries and Wildlife <br />is holding a series of hearings on the Endangered <br />Species Act (ESA). At last week's hearing, all of the <br />witnesses supported the ESA's emphasis on using the <br />best available science and a strengthened role for states <br />in ESA implementation. Most of them also stressed the <br />need for a degree of federal oversight and standards. <br /> <br />Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt affirmed that the ESA <br />must be amended to constructively shift the ESA's focus <br />from a single species to a multi-species approaCh, to <br />provide more incentives and certainty for private <br />landowners, and to increase the states' role against a <br />flexible federal framework. He also emphasized that the <br />House Interior appropriations bill cutting ESA funding <br />would undermine beneficial reforms now contemplated, <br />such as funding for state acquisition of species' habitat, <br />enhancing state activities in species' recovery, and the <br />Departmenfs cooperative efforts with state, local and <br />tribal governments and private landowners in eliminating <br />the need for listings. <br /> <br />John Ha~a, chairman of WGA's staff working group on <br />ESA reauthorization, presented the WGA's "essential <br />