Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />2~09 <br /> <br />II-8 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The pred,pitable water flowing into the storm is usually estimated <br /> <br /> <br />from l2-hour persisting dewpoints in the warm moist air upwind from the storm <br /> <br /> <br />center, under the assumption that the air is saturated. The maximum amount <br /> <br /> <br />,of precipitable water that could occur at the same time of year as the storm <br /> <br /> <br />,idate is determined from the maximum l2-hour persisting dewpoints of record, <br /> <br /> <br />: again under the assumption that the air is saturated. A leeway of 15 days <br /> <br />I <br />itowards higher dewpoints is often allowed under the assumption that a storm <br /> <br /> <br />Icould have occurred 15 days earlier or later without any appreciable change <br />I <br /> <br />I:in ,its precipitation-producing effectiveness. The precipitable water is <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />,I usually computed for a column of saturated air with base at the ground and <br />I <br /> <br />Itop at the 200-millibarleve1. <br /> <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The selection of a surface dewpoint representative of the precipi- <br /> <br /> <br />'table water flowing into a storm often presents problems since the dewpoint <br /> <br /> <br />,must be in the warm moist air inflow at the ground and outside the rainfall <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,area in order to be representative. <br />, <br />, <br />jthe selection of a dewpoint at a considerable distance from the storm center, <br />, <br />loften 300 or more miles m,ay, It is difficult sometimes, for different <br />" <br />l,ana1ysts to agree exactly on the same dewpoint. Also, they may not agree on <br />~ ' <br />I,the same elevation for the base of the moisture column, i. e., the average <br />!i <br />'il)eight of orographic barriers to moisture infle>l. <br /> <br />This requirement generally necessitates <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Plates 11-3 and 11-4 sho>l the maximizing factors used in the USBR <br /> <br /> <br />'study for transposing and maximi,ing the June 1964 }lontana storm. The de>l- <br /> <br /> <br />'points used in computing the adjustment factors >lere selected for points <br /> <br /> <br />roughly, 900 miles southeast from the observed and transposed storm centers, <br /> <br /> <br />',>lhich is a longer distance than usual, but the adjustment factors obtained <br /> <br /> <br />approximate those usually involved in maximizing the transposing outstanding <br /> <br /> <br />istorms. The reason for the remote dewpoint locations was that unsettled <br /> <br /> <br />iweather conditions precluded the selection of nearer deW'points. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />An innovation introduced in the USBR study '>TaS the use of two <br /> <br /> <br />adjustment factors, one for the rainfall at the higher elevations (1.47) in <br /> <br /> <br />ithe western portion of the project basin, and the other for the rainfall at <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />i I <br /> <br />IDAMES e MOORE <br /> <br />- <br />