My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03196
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:07 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:36:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443.600
Description
Narrows Unit - Studies
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/30/1975
Author
Dames and Moore
Title
Flood Study Narrows Dam South Platte River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2907 <br /> <br />II-6 <br /> <br />between the rainfall patterns of these storms leave little doubt as to the <br />transposability of the Montana storm. Plate 11-1 shows the isohyetal pattern' <br />for the June 1964 Montana storm in place, while Plate 11-2 shows the May 1969 <br />Colorado transposed storm pattern. The latter pattern was revised slightly <br />for differences in orientation of the Montana mountains and that of the <br />Colorado mountains to which it was transposed. <br /> <br />In the placement of the transposed pattern, as shown in Plate II-I, <br /> <br /> <br />an attempt was made to locate the rainfall centers on slopes approximately <br /> <br /> <br />those on which they were located in Montana. The degree of success achieved <br /> <br /> <br />in this attempt is indicated by comparison of the slopes roughly estimated as <br /> <br /> <br />the differences between the highest elevation in each storm center and the <br /> <br /> <br />highest elevation 25 miles upwind, i.e., to the east. These differences in <br /> <br /> <br />elevation are compared in Table II-I. The differences agree reasonably well <br /> <br />6/ <br />except for Center D, and the Chatfield report- suggests that the location of <br /> <br /> <br />the storm rainfall center in that part of the project basin is not necessarily <br /> <br /> <br />fixed by the orography. <br /> <br />It should be noted that the June 1964 storm rainfall pattern trans- <br /> <br /> <br />posed was one drawn by the USBR. There are several quasi-official versions <br /> <br /> <br />of the geographic distribution of the rainfall in this storm. The variations <br /> <br /> <br />result from differences in judgment required in the interpolation of rainfall <br /> <br /> <br />amounts between gages. While differences in the various isohyetal patterns <br /> <br /> <br />could result in appreciable errors over certain small areas, differences in <br /> <br /> <br />average rainfall over areas as large as 10,000 square miles would be relatively <br /> <br /> <br />small if the maps were constructed by experienced analysts. <br /> <br />Assessment of the Transposition i <br /> <br /> <br />The only adjustment made by the USBR up to this point in the transpd- <br /> <br /> <br />sition of the Montana storm pattern was,to "bend" the original pattern betwee1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6/ U,S. Weather Bureau, "Probable Maximum Precipitation over South Platte I <br />- , <br />River, Colorado, and Minnesota River, Minnesota", Hydromet Report 44, I <br />1969, <br /> <br />DAMES e. MOORE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.