Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ill; (- <br />--~ <br />(ncart\ele) <br /> <br />') <br />TA~l[ ,', <br />~~ <br />near he/e) <br /> <br />Reservoir Pool at 4,383 Feet (1,336 Metres) <br />041.1 <br />- th~~ater-table surface computed by the model for the proposed <br /> <br />reservoir pool at 4,383 ft (1,'336 m) is shown on figure 6. The computed <br />rate of evapotranspiration ~as 22 ft3/s (0.62 m3/s) which is 4 ft3/s <br />, <br />3 <br />(0.11 m Is) less than that for simulated existing conditions. Thus, the <br /> <br />decrease in evapotranspiration rate caused by the inundated area was <br /> <br />greater than the increase caused by higher water levels in the aquifer. <br /> <br />Computed ground-water discharge is summarized in table 2 for the <br /> <br />reservoir pool at 4,383 ft (1,336 m). The net effect of the proposed <br /> <br />reservoir on ground-~ater discharge ~as to redistribute the discharge in <br /> <br />the downstream direction s~milar to the preceding solution. As shown in <br /> <br />table 2, ground-water discharge decreased by 11 ft3/s (0.31 m3/s) above <br /> <br />1 .... - .. . r- ,. 3, ,^,.... 3, '\ '" , <br />tIe proposea oam ana J..llcrea:-:;ea oy L> I:t: IS \"u......l.. III IS) ue.LUW Lu"::' pl.'O- <br /> <br />posed darn. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />;;::; <br />