Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />W <br />CD <br />o <br /> <br />colluvium; and, 3) dissected Mancos shale uplands. Some of the geologic or <br />soil forming materials were identified in several geomorphic units - cutting <br />across geomorphic boundaries. A vertic-like swelling soil was mapped both on <br />the low pediment and on dissected shale surfaces. The data suggest that the <br />parent material for these soils is probably aeolian or windblown in origin,as <br />it occurred on both the low flat areas and along the southern and eastern <br />sides of the outcrops; it also lacks rock fragments and was noticeably silty <br />or very fine sandy loam in texture. <br /> <br />Eleven different soil series in 22 mapping units were recognized in the <br />Woodsite site (Schafer, 1981). Few of these series were established during <br />the Soil Conservation Service inventory of the area. The series identified <br />during the detailed survey were named for the purposes of the survey (Table 1). <br /> <br />Torriorthents varying in depths and texture were the most common soils en- <br />countered. The soil series were delineated partially on the basis of the <br />depth to bedrock or para1ithic horizon. The para1ithic contacts, described as <br />CR horizon herein, and shale were defined as that point where more than 50% gf <br />the shale was retained on a 2 mm sieve after one minute of shaking. Slightly <br />weathered shale (R horizon) was defined as a depth where 5% or less of the <br />material passed a 2 mm sieve and shale fragments averaged over 1 cm in thick~ <br />ness. In many instances, a prominent accumulation of salts and gypsum oc- <br />curred just above the R horizon or the CR horizon, forming a Ccs or Cca <br />1 ayer . <br /> <br />Vegetation Resource Inventory: A literature review was included in the <br />vegetatlon lnventory study. The more significant papers reviewed include that <br />of Ibrahim (1963) and West and Ibrahim (1960) which discuss the soil and <br />vegetative relationships of plant communities developing on the Mancos shale <br />of southeastern Utah. In those studies, they identified and described four <br />edephical1y controlled climax plant communities on the Mancos shale. The <br />communities identified included: Atrip1ex confertifo1ia/Hi1aria jamseii, <br />Atrip1ex nuttal1ii/nutta11i/Hi1aria jameseii, Atriplex nutta11ii gardnerii/ <br />astor zyloriza and Atrlplex corrugata. Lusby, et al. (1963) in a hydrologic <br />study identified Sarcobatus vermicu1atus as a dominant on the lower part of <br />the main drainages, Atrtip1ex currugata as occurring on alkaline flats in the <br />upper reaches of the dralnage basins, Artemesia tradentata and cr~sothamnus <br />nauseosus on alluvial soils along the drainages, and Atriplex con ertifolia <br />and Hil ari a jamsei i on upland sandy soil s. Branson et al (1976) stUdi ed <br />several sOll factors affecting the geographic distribution of salt desert <br />shrubs. He concluded that the soil moisture relationship was the primary <br />factor affecting distribution of salt desert shrubs. Soil soluble salts <br />appear to be an important cause of community differences. Plant communities <br />occurring on soils with the highest osmotic stress are dominated by Atrip1ex <br />nutta11ii. Communities dominated by Atri,lex confertifolia, Sarcobatus <br />vermicu1atus, and Eurotia lanata have soi s with decreasing osmotic <br />concentratlons. <br /> <br />An initial reconnaissance study of the site was made in July 1981, where <br />tentative community types were identified. Representative sampling sites were <br />then selected. Sites were sampled as follows: <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />% ~ <br /> <br />. ~ "'- ~,>~" '''--'' .'.' <br /> <br />