Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />'J <br />~~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Confined animal feeding operations are also required to obtain discharge <br />permits. Permits for feedlots usually require that there be no discharge <br />from control facilities except for overflows resulting from unusual storm <br />events. Most of the feedlots are located in the plains area of the South <br />Platte and Arkansas valleys. Although the potential for pollution from <br />feedlots can be significant, they generally have not been a problem because <br />of their geographic location and the precautions taken to contain runoff. <br /> <br />B) Non-point Source Problems <br /> <br />Water pollution from non-point sources falls into the follow~ng categories: <br /> <br />1) Irrigated Agriculture - The principal pollutants associated with <br />irrigated agriculture in Colorado are salinity and nitrates. Salt <br />loading from irrigated agriculture is particularly significant in the <br />Colorado River system. Programs are underway in the Grand Valley, <br />Gunnison Valley, and the San Juan Basin area to evaluate and control <br />these problems. <br /> <br />High nitrate levels in alluvial groundwater are associated with the use <br />of feedlot wastes and commercial fertilizers on irrigated cropland. The <br />problem is most significant in the South Platte Valley of Weld County, <br />where many of the wells used for drinking water do not meet public <br />health criteria for nitrates. <br /> <br />2) Non-irrigated Agriculture - The principal pollutant associated with dry <br />croplands and rangeland is sediment. Most non-irrigated cropland in <br />Colorado is located on the eastern high plains and generally does not <br />pose serious water pollution problems. <br /> <br />3) Mining - The principal pollutants from mining activities are heavy <br />metals. Early mining activities in Colorado destroyed the aquatic <br />habitat in many mountain streams and approximately 450 miles of degraded <br />streams remain today. <br /> <br />The control of water pollution from inactive mines is a difficult and <br />complex process. Since most inactive mines are not truly abandoned, <br />mine owners must be located and notified of the need for remedial <br />measures. Because the mines are not producing, there are limited <br />financial resources available to pay for the clean-up process, the costs <br />of which have traditionally been extremely high. While various new <br />types of relatively low-cost techniques have been proposed for inactive <br />mines, few have actually been tested for cost-effec~iveness under field <br />conditions. <br /> <br />The Colorado Department of Natural Resource's Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division, under a grant from the U. S. Office of Surface Mining, is <br />evaluat~ng the feasibility of controlling inactive mine discharge and <br />restoring water quality. The study has focused on two priority areas - <br />the Arkansas River near Leadville and Clear Creek in the vicinity of <br />Idaho Springs. <br /> <br />-4- <br />