Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002525 <br /> <br />Table 2 summarizes the modeling results when physical and legal availability constraints are <br />placed on the "ideal" demands. There are changes from values listed in my June 26, 2000 <br />memorandum. These are mainly due to "new" averages being used. For M & I, the decrease of <br />210 ac-ft is due to an incorrect starting value. This was corrected for this effort. <br /> <br /> veraee mo e e ePletlOns , va ues In acre- eet <br />Use Current Change 2045 Comments <br />Level Level <br />Agriculture 87,765 -10 87,755 Affected bv senior M&I and Power <br />M&I 5,201 9,899 15,100 BBC Proiected Increase <br />Power 16,947 32,350 BBC Projected Increase <br /> 15,403 <br />EXDorts 2,815 0 2,814 No Change <br />Evaporation 12.543 0 12,543 No ChanQe <br />Totals 125,271 25,292 150,562 <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />did d I . <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The shortages shown in Table 3 are partly due to the increase power demands as well as physical <br />supply limits. Some of the agriculture depletion shortages occur due to the operation of <br />Wyoming's demands in Water District 54 as well as the method of calculating irrigation <br />efficiencies. <br /> <br />Table 3 <br />Average modeled depletion shortages from <br />"ideal" values in acre feet <br /> <br /> , - <br /> Current <br />Use Level 2045 Level <br />AQriculture 4,493 4,503 <br />M&I 1 207 <br />Power 0 0 <br />EXDorts 102 !O3 <br />EvaDoration 0 0 <br />Totals 4,596 4,813 <br /> <br />! <br />f <br /> <br />Appendix C - Technical Memoranda from Colorado and Wyoming <br /> <br />C-4 <br />