Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br /> <br />nay for bonds maturing around 2005. Shorter terms provide a lower <br />rate while longer terms require a higher rate. It is possible that <br />a rO.te higher than 6% "rill be reo.uirod by 1981-1982. <br />The 1978 PH of the capital cost differences HC-33 are computed <br />as follows. <br /> <br />0-17,538 <br />12,419-17,538 <br />12,419- 0 <br />0- 0 <br /> <br />PH HC-53 <br /> <br />-14,732 <br /> <br />-53,401 <br /> <br />2,293 <br />o <br /> <br />PU Aurora <br /> <br />Years <br /> <br />PH Factor <br />.840 <br />10.432 <br />.185 <br />3.337 <br /> <br />HC-33 Ca.p. Diff. <br /> <br />1981 <br />1982-2005 <br />2006 <br />after 2006 <br /> <br />o <br />26,727 <br />474 <br />o <br /> <br />Total 1978 PH ($1000) <br />Note that a minus sign means that the <br />less costly than the 3trontia Springs <br /> <br />-65,835 27,201 <br />mouth of canyon alternative is <br />alternative. <br /> <br />B. OM&R Cost Portion <br />Cost Item (1978) Corps Table 1 Alternative Assumptions <br />SS HC 33 HC <br /> (no pOl-ler sale) 01/k\Jh) <br /> ., <br />Darn&,J a terl"8Y ' 19 25 19 25 <br />Treatment 786 786 786 786 <br />Energy in plant -108 288 0 240 <br />Pumping (1st&2nd lifts) 0 1702 0 1418 <br />Replacement 272 274 272 274 <br />Total OW<R 969 3075 1077 2743 <br /> <br />The contractor has determined that the 1973 electric cost to the <br />Denver Hater Department is just under 3111mh from their pOl-ler reports. <br />Public 3ervice eom~any of Colorado was contacted for verification. <br />Regarding the increase of electric rates, .the Corps cited a <br />ncwspa"er article showing the nJ.tional aver8.ge rate of increase in <br />electric pOller costs to be 3%. HOl-lever, in the Denvcr metro area the <br />4 year 1974-1978 rate of increase for residential :;enTice I-Ia8 detcrmined ! <br />by the contractor to be 5.5?;. Thc Colondo Public Utilitics Com.",ission/ <br />e;.,..pects future increaGGs in the Denver area to be less th2.J1 the national <br />average due to the locally favorable cost of co,,1. Further, the <br />to" price block of pNlCr fOl' the Denver '.-later DepertClcnt is just uncler <br /> <br />00693 <br />