Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Fry-Ark Reoperation- Operational impacts throughout the basin would need to be <br />addressed. <br />. Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement- As a part of the purpose the reduction of dam safety <br />risks should be addressed. Wetland impacts would also need to be addressed. For all <br />new projects both the impacts of the inundation pool and the impact of operations <br />1452. should be addressed. <br />Gravel Pits- NEP A issues would need to be addressed at the time of commitment for <br />the proposed reservoir site. <br />. Wiliams Creek Reservoir- Similar comments, it was also noted that this reservoir could <br />be a part of a water reuse and reclamation project for potable uses. <br />4. In regard to pennits it was noted that both an EIS on Administrative Actions and on <br />Legislative actions would be required. <br />5. In regard to Elephant Rock Reservoir, the agreement with Friends of the Arkansas should be <br />addressed to show how it ties to these projects as an alternative considered but to be dropped. <br />6. A chart of reasonably foreseeable future actions should be prepared. <br />7. A TMDL type of analysis should be prepared for all water quality impacts. <br />8. USEPA concurred with the USBR that the USBR is the most likely lead federal pennitting <br />agency. <br />9. USEPA could be either a cooperating or reviewing agency. USEPA usually does not ask for <br />reimbursement of their costs. <br />10. The NRCS should be added as a pennitting or review agency. The Limestone Graveyard EA <br />should be reviewed for input on water quality issues. <br />II. The baseline analysis should reflect current conditions rather than historical conditions. <br />12. The Lake McConaughy FERC relicense studies should also be reviewed for discussion of <br />current versus historic baseline condition studies. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />..... .._'.J'" <br />