Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Alternative 2 - Improved Water Management and Minimum Structural <br />Improvements <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Entire Project Area Sprinkler Irrigated (pumping <br />plant and pipeline distribution system) <br /> <br />Alternative 3A - Entire Project Area Sprinkler Irrigated (six <br />separate pumping plants and distribution systems) <br /> <br />Alternative 3B - Entire Project Area Sprinkler Irrigated <br />(individual on-farm pumping) <br /> <br />Alternative 4 - 14,200 Acres Irrigated with Automated Border <br />Systems and 1,500 Acres Sprinkler Irrigated <br /> <br />Alternative 5 - 50 Percent of Cropland Irrigated by Automated <br />Border Systems and 50 Percent Irrigated by <br />Sprinkler Systems <br /> <br />Alternative 6 - Land Retirement (acquisition of private land) <br /> <br />Alternative 8 - Irrigation Retirement (livestock operation) - (NED) <br /> <br />Alternative 9 - Irrigation Water Reduction (reduced water delivery) <br /> <br />Alternative 10 - Pump Saline Well Water to Sublettes Flat for <br />Evaporation <br /> <br />Alternative 11 - Landowner Preferred (combination of alternatives) <br /> <br />Alternative 12 - Landowner Preferred-Modified (combination of <br />alternatives, with three pumping plants and <br />pipelines) <br /> <br />Alternative 13 - Environmental Quality (combination of Alternative <br />4 and a reduced Alternative 10) <br /> <br />Table <br /> <br />S-l - Summary of Alternatives (costs, benefits, <br />and impacts of the alternatives analyzed) <br /> <br />NOTE: With the exception of the irrigation retirement Alternatives <br />5 and 6, all alternatives evaluated and displayed in Table S-l <br />assumes that the existing Agricultural Conservation programs as <br />administered by the-Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation <br />Service (ASCS), with technical assistance provided by the Soil <br />Conservation Service (SCS), will continue to be offered and <br />utilized at the same rate as in the past few years. <br /> <br />Alternatives 2 through 13, as displayed in Table S-l, used <br />Alternative 1 Future Without a Project (No Action) as an <br />evaluation base. All values shown in the table are incremental <br />to Alternative 1. <br /> <br />-,. ,(. ,1 !'. <br />v Ji.. ,-!'-.l-1 <br /> <br />S-3 <br /> <br />II <br />J <br />