WSP03128 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, Mr. Roland Robison Page 3 necessary. in the view of the Committee, in order to assure consistent power operations at all Federal reservoirs on the Colorado River, and to emphasize the point that the production of hydroelectric enerRY is a relevant factor that must be considered if the financial feasibility of Federal water resource developments in the Colorado River Basin is to be reasonably assured, as hereinbefore indicated (H. R. Rep. No. 1312, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1968 U. S. Code Congo & Ad. News 3729, emphasis added). The recently adopted method of operating to avoid anticipated spills does involve some risk to the water cvnsar~ation cper~tio~ ~nd must be reconsidered as uses in the Upper Basin approach maximum development. The critical point in the alternatives selection process of the Depart- ment still lies ahead. The selection of reasonable alternatives must be carefully completed considering the concepts of practicality and economic, legal and technical feasibility. Alternatives must not be selected that are; "simply desirable from the standpoint of [special interest groups]" (Council on Environmental Quality "Memorandum: Questions and Answers About the NEPA" Regulations," answer to question 2a). Those alternatives (including the previously mentioned four) that fallout under such an analysis should be identified as meeting the criteria of 40 CFR lS02.14(a) as having been rigorously explored and eliminated from detailed study. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to participate in the GCD-EIS process and trust these comments will be given serious consideration. If We can further explain our concerns or position, please let us know. WEC:pj cc: Upper Colorado River Commissioners Lower Basin States Representatives Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Assistant Commissioner Resource Management