Laserfiche WebLink
<br />USDA's Onfarm Irrigation improvement Program <br /> <br />.... <br />m <br />(D <br />o <br /> <br />The SOli Conservation Service (SCS) <br />of the U S Depanment 01 Agriculture <br />(USDA) and Water and Power <br />Resources Service are WOrking together <br />to coordlnale the salinity control <br />program In the ColoradO River Basm <br />Each agency however, plans funds. <br />and Implements liS own programs <br />The COst-eflectlveness 01 the USDA <br />on/arm program complements the cost- <br />eltecllveness 01 Water and Power"s 011- <br />larm programs In many cases. the <br />on/arm conlrol measures cannOI work <br />properly unless the ofl-farm measures <br />are Implemented concurrently While <br />there afe some localized dllferences. me <br />salt removal potenllaI at onlarm <br />programs IS similar 10 that of theoU-larm <br />features For InStance. In Uinta BaSin, <br />the on/arm program IS expectea to <br />reduce the salinity at Jmperlal Dam by at <br />1eaSfs mg'L while IheO'fnarm program <br />-.IS antlclpaled to reduce gllinlt)',j!02utL <br />mg L <br />USDA's onfarm Ifrlgatlon Improve- <br />ment prOgram IS now unaerway With two <br />Title IllrflgatlOn source units In opera- <br />lIOn Grana Valley In CoIoraao and Uinta <br />BaSin In Utah The follOWing prOVides a <br />bnef status of USDA s aCllvltles <br />Installallon of onlarm salinity conlrol <br />measures and associated lateral Im- <br />provements In Grand Valley began in <br />fiscal year 1979 when Congress <br />recommended th<~t tt::l~ Agricultural <br />Stabilization anq C;::onservatlon SerVice <br />(ASCS) use Sl 7 m.JULon 01 ItS <br />fl.gricultural Conservation Program <br />(AGPl1u.nds.ettlu.s.lv~JYJor cost-sharln9 <br />PL~_gl.ce~U_or saliMI' Control In Grane!- <br />Valley -Additionally, Con~j[es.s_recQIJ1- <br />mended that the $C_S.J,J~fl. S1 7(tOO.Q <br />01 its Conservat~eeratl~n IU.Q.dS. <br />fQi.J_he tectloical as~!..stance _needed to <br />desl9f) ~nd In,itan_t_he pracllces In fiscal <br />years 1-980 and 1981. Congress <br />recommended USDA continue thiS <br />activity at tne same annual funding level <br />During FY 1980 USDA prOVided <br />assistance to a total of 380 farmers 'n <br />Grand VallE'y Including Inlllallng Irriga- <br />tion water 'Tlanagement for 3,329 acres <br />Some 140 farmers completed one or <br />more practices during that time <br />The malor practices Installed and cost <br />shared In FY 1980. and tne tOlallo date <br />11979 and 1980) '" lhe Grand Valley are <br />listed belov. <br /> <br />".'" <br /> <br /> Tol."O <br />" ,~ . ~ ~ <br />, -.. " )J<' <br />" J" 5" ~'l <br />n~' "&'J <br />" ;-, ~ " <br /> <]' " <br /> " '. <br /> " "" <br /> <br />..;:~ ".- ,.'e', <br /> <br />-,~'" '.t""., " <br /> <br />_,"<'Co',..",,," <br /> <br />,-:",~,: p,D"""~' <br />.",~ -..~ <br /> <br />.,- ,~,.,-. .,,,~-- <br /> <br />". ,_.,~, <br /> <br />'. 1_"0, . ~"" . <br /> <br />A Significant difference to trad<tlOnal <br />programs IS IheemphaSlson automation <br />of surlace Irrigated systems In the Grand <br />Valley The automation 01 surface <br />Irrigated systems permits Irrigation <br />water to be automatically changed from <br />one set to the next. uSing timed controls <br />on valves and check gates ThiS means <br />the Irrrgator does not ellen need to be <br />on site when the water IS changed <br />Implementation Of these types of <br />systems do. howeller. reqUire a more <br />sophisticated approach to deSign to <br />accomodate the changes Although <br />rellablJlty problems halle been ex- <br />peflenced With timers and Olher In- <br />novatllle equipment. lomt elforts by <br />tarmers and USDA personnel are effec- <br />tively resolVing these concerns <br />The automation of surface Irrigation <br />systems has a two-fold benefit It saves <br />the larmer preCIOUS time and It allows <br />changing irrigation selsal the fight lime <br />to avOid overwalermg With Its allendant <br />salt loading of Ihe Colorado Allier <br />SpeCial allentlon IS being given to <br />protecting and enhancmg the envI- <br />ronmental values In the Valley Plan- <br />nmg has been mltlaled on live onfarm <br />Wildlife dellelopments Practices <br />planned Include pondS, tree plantlngs, <br />tood plots. fenc,ng and grass seedmg <br />The practicabIlity 01 level basm irriga- <br />tion m the Grand Valley IS also under <br />study Alralla com and small grains and <br />field crops common to Grand Valley <br />have been produced on lhe baSins <br />Because of encouraging researCh <br />results through USDAs SCience and <br />EducatiOn Administration. several small <br />level baSins. about 12 acres total_ halle <br />been Installed by a group of local <br />farmers With assistance from USDA S <br />onfarm Improvement program <br />In Uinta Basin. SCS Increased me f'eld <br />staff from 5 to 16 people A biOlogist on <br />assignment from FISh and Wildlife <br />Service has been added to Ine USDA <br />plannmg staff to help prOVide lechnlcal <br />assistance for planning deSigning, <br />mstallatlOn. and tollowup for wlldlde <br />development practices assOCiated w!1h <br />the ontarm Irngatlon Improvements <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Implementation of nnfilrm salinity <br />control measures In Uinta Basm was <br />initiated In FV 1980 With S2 million In <br />AS:P funding SCS prOlllded technical <br />asslslance 10 some 119 farmers on 6,028 <br />acres The partlclpatmg farmers earned <br />a total 01 S678,loo m FY 1980 for <br />Installing 154.509 flneal feet of Plpelmes_ <br />16235 lineal leet 01 gated pipe. 30 Slde- <br />rolt sprrnkler systems. 6 ponds. ane! 11 <br />pumps and levelmg 33 acres of land <br />The balance of the fundS Will be earned <br />during Ihe sprrng Of 1981 apPlYing <br />Similar practices along With Wildlife <br />related practJces <br />USDA salin III' control studies are_ <br />n~arly completed m the Lower Gunnison <br />BaSin in Colorado Virgin River '" <br />Nevada, Anzon;" and Utah; BIQ Sandy <br />-River BaSin in Wyoming: and McElmo <br />Greek In Colorado <br />In the Lower Gunnison Basin. eight <br />alternative plans have been developed <br />by USDA for salinity control These <br />plans prOVide for salt reductions ranging <br />from 65.000 to 420,000 tons per year A <br />pubhc InvOlvement effort IS underway In <br />an allemptto Idenllfy the pre!erred <br />alternative <br />The Virgin River has been diVided Into <br />three separate study areaS-the Moapa <br />Valley Virgin Valley and Upper Virgin <br />River subevaluatlon unils A draft USDA <br />Implementation plan was prepared 'or <br />some 5.000 irrigated acres In Moapa <br />Valley The estimated dlstflbutlon dale <br />for the reporllS March 1981 <br />The USDA report on the Big Sandy <br />River Unit was distributed in January. <br />1981 bullmplementatlon IS being <br />deferred pending a searCh for cost <br />elfectlve alternatives that protect ex- <br />Isting water uses and lifestyles USDA <br />will be worl<.lng With personnel tram the <br />State 01 Wyoming and the Water and <br />Power Resources Serv,ce In lormulatlng <br />additional alternatl~e plans and supply- <br />Ing pertinent informatIOn developed <br />dUring Its onfarm studies <br />USDA will analyze the Inventory data <br />on McElmo Creek In t"e next sox months <br />Water and sail budgets also Will be <br />prepared Th~dralt USDA sludy ~ <br />IS expected by September 30. 1981 <br />- <br />