My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03104
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:40 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:32:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.600
Description
John Martin Reservoir
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
7/31/1981
Title
RESSYM - A John Martin Reservoir System Simulation - written in CDC Fortran Extended Vers. 4
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-1 <br /> <br />~', Program Procedure <br />-"~-~j'----- . - - -----" -" <br /> <br />~. <br />.' <br />.. <br />CO <br />~ <br /> <br />MathematIcal method and theory <br /> <br />Given the averaye daily outflow and end of thu day cuntents <br />for John Martin Reservoir, the inflow may be expressed as <br /> <br />1 = 0 + 65 <br /> <br />(1)2 <br /> <br />Where <br /> <br />I = inflow (also average for the day) <br />o = outflow <br />65 = change in storage (contents). <br /> <br />The terms 0 and 65 iJre measured. Thc term 1 is therefure computed. <br />If the reservoir seepdye losses are assumed to be negLigible, <br />the evaporation may be indicated as a part of 65 by the relation <br /> <br />65 = I - [0+ (E v) ] <br /> <br />(2 ) <br /> <br />which simplifies to <br /> <br />65 =I-O-Ev <br /> <br />( 2 - 1 ) <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />Ev = evaporation <br /> <br />It can be seen from equatIon 2 that the quantity [O+(Ev)] is <br />the total outflow. The quantity Ev is in additon to the measured <br />outflow. Because the quantity equivalent to the evaporation i5 <br />unaccounted for, the evaporation as qUdntified in equation 2-1 is <br />effected as a negative inflow. This can be exempiified under the <br />following special conditions: <br /> <br />a) <br />".b) <br />hence c) <br /> <br />the evaporation is in excess of the actual inflow <br />the change in storage is greater than the measured outflow <br />the inflow as computed by eq. 1 will be negative. <br /> <br />In reality, the seepaye losses of John Martin Reservoir are <br />probably very small when compared to the total water lost by <br />evaporation. The actudl evapordtion, therefore, can only be <br />dccurately determined by the application of pdn evapuration data to <br />compute totdl lake evapordtion. <br /> <br />If the historical operdtion of John Martin Reservoir were <br />emuldted thruugh a set of operating criteria ur principles, it Cdn <br />be seen from the above that the differences betweun actual <br />evapordtion losses dnd those dttributable to the operdtiny criteria <br />will be small given the degree to which the operating criteria <br />emulate the historical operation. This would be true because the <br />evaporation of the conservation pool, assumed to be described <br />accurately in the term 65, is determined by the contents of the <br />conservation pool and the emulation desired will correspond to the <br />'h i sTo'r i-cod 1'--0 p'e'r ,.-tYo'n' -in- t'h'c-hi-y h-e'st-d eyree'; -~ ----" -- -, -------- ---- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.