Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'d <br />':;) <br />L'") <br />o <br />.:..~) <br /> <br />.1oradO <br /> <br />SUM}!ARY SHEET <br />Grand Valley Unit <br />River Basin Salinity Control <br /> <br />prol <br /> <br />December 1979 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />LOCATION <br /> <br />.--') <br /> <br />The Grand Valley Unit is located in west-central <br />Colorado along the reach of the Colorado River <br />between the towns of Palisade and Mack, and <br />includes Grand Junction, the largest city in <br />western Colorado. <br /> <br />PURPOSE <br /> <br />The purpose of the Grand Valley Unit is to lower <br />the salt loading to the Colorado River by the <br />concrete lining of canals and installation of <br />pipeline on laterals and installation of On-farm <br />Improvements. The combination of the above <br />programs would reduce the amount of ground water <br />allowed to percolate into the underlying highly <br />saline soils and Mancos Shale Formation. It is <br />thought that the estimated 650,000 to 850,000 <br />tons of salt added to the river annually can be <br />reduced as much as 60 percent by the implemen- <br />tation of the above measures. <br /> <br />STATUS <br /> <br />The Grand Valley Unit is a component of the <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Project and was <br />authorized for construction by the Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Act of 1974 (Public <br />Law 93-320). <br /> <br />'\ '~-';-. <br /> <br />A feasibility study in the Grand Valley was ini- <br />tiated in FY72 to determine efficiencies of the <br />conveyance systems to be gained by reducing the <br />seepage losses. The various studies conducted <br />include the following: (1) determination of <br />irrigated acreage; (2) canal and lateral sizing <br />studies; (3) determination of the location, ca- <br />pacity, and condition of present canal and <br />lateral structures; and (4) computations of <br />quantities of construction materials. This data <br />is being used to arrive at the feasibility level <br />cost estimate for the entire project. An ap- <br />praisal level cost estimate has been made. <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />Preliminary environmental studies have been con- <br />ducted on the unit, and a Negative Determination <br />of Environmental Impact was made by the Regional <br />Director in June 1978 for an initial phase of <br />the unit known as Stage One. The Commissioner <br />concurred with the determination in July 1978. <br />A Special Report fo~ Stage One of the Grand Valley <br />Systems Improvement Program has been completed. <br />Stage One covers approximately 10 percent of the <br />unit area and is designed to provide information <br />to fully analyze the effectiveness of the proposed <br />plan. <br /> <br />The FY80 appropriations include $3,650,000 for <br />construction and monitoring of Stage One and <br />continued planning of Stage Two. <br /> <br />PLAN <br /> <br />The preliminary plan for the overall Grand Valley <br />Unit indicates that the salt loading of the Colo- <br />rado River in the Grand Valley could be reduced <br />by about 410,000 tons annually by decreasing the <br />amount of irrigation return [lows and conveyance <br />system seepage moving through saline substrata <br />and picking up salts. The reduction would re- <br />sult in a decrease in the salinity of the river <br /> <br />at Imperial Dam of approximately 43 mg/L and <br />would be accomplished by a two-segment pro- <br />gram conducted by the Water and Power Resources <br />Service in the Department of the Interior and <br />the Soil Conservation Service in the Department <br />of Agriculture. A Water Systems Improvement <br />program.would be. conducted by the Water and Power <br />Resources Service in which canals and laterals <br />would be lined or placed in pipe to reduce seepage. <br />Since only lined canals were included in the plan <br />at authorization, the approval of Congress would <br />be required to use pipe for those facilities. <br />On-farm improvements, including upgrading of <br />irrigation systems by cost assistance, improvement <br />of irrigation management, improvement of grazing <br />lands and grazing practices on private rangeland, <br />and voluntary wildlife improvement measures would <br />be conducted by the Soil Conservation Service to <br />reduce deep percolation from farm operations. A <br />wildlife area and watering ponds would be provided <br />by the Water and Power Resources Service to compen- <br />sate for wildlife habitat losses resulting from the <br />Water Systems ImprovE~ment program. This wildlife <br />measure was also not included in the unit plan when <br />it was authorized and would require the approval of <br />Congress. <br /> <br />STAGE ONE DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />The unit would be developed in stages to allow <br />the Water and Power Resources Service to begin con- <br />struction in a portion of the valley where plans <br />and designs are complete, where sufficient data <br />are available to aSSE~SS the impact of the initial <br />development while investigations and planning <br />continue on the rest of the unit, and where environ- <br />mental impacts would not be significant. Results <br /> <br /> <br />'\ <br /> <br />