Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />,~ <br />~ <br />-..J <br />OJ <br />00 <br /> <br /> <br />"""t' <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />in October 1970t directed their engineering consultants to develop a <br />plan that would prevent return of the approximately 30,000 tons of <br />sult contained in the b~owdown water each year to the Colorado River <br /> <br />~jYflt(>m. <br />CClnclusJ.otls <br /> <br />The Colorado River Board has adopted as a key pou.cy objective <br />that r,:lli.ni.ty oE the tower Colorado River should be lIIaintnined at or <br />near r ,-"sent 1...\1('10. Salinity 1.8 recogni?:ed as u basi.nwide problem <br />and tlllli.nity control meaSUres 0110111.d he und(Jttul~en in cooperation with <br />tl\l' jpdl'l"nl gt:lVerlHlIcnl and the Colorado River Ilosirt stateo. Mexico is <br />also vitally ihterestedt as Colorado River salinity is ohe bf the majol <br />controversial issues between the United States and Mexico. <br />In the immediate future it is important that the FWQA issue its <br />long awaited Colorado River salinity report so that detailed informa" <br />tion on its reconnaissance level studies of salinity control projects <br />\1il.l IH' made public. It in !llllo f1ccelHlflt'y to commence tho next step <br />of feasibility level studies us soon us possible. <br /> <br />-1l~ <br /> <br />r _ ,,' <br /> <br />;,,_HI;- <br />