WSP03082 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

17 "',:0636 adjudicates a reserved water right of slightly less than 500,000 acre-feet for those tribes to irrigate just over 100,000 acres of land. The Tribes' water right is also much larger than any existing Indian water projects. For example, the Navajo Irrigation Project can divert about 370,000 acre-feet to irrigate 110,000 acres (although the Navajo Tribe may have additional water rights). Each reservation's situation is, of course, different. But by any measurement the right to divert 1,050,000 acre-feet to irrigate nearly 300,000 acres is, we concluded, a very, very large right. Most importantly, the 291,798 acres were determined irriqab1e by Stetson Engineers, the Tribes' experts. These include essentially all irrigable lands within several miles of the Missouri River, and all irrigable lands in the watershed of the Biq Muddy Creek on the Reservation, as well as most irrigable la~ds within the watershed of the Poplar River on the Reser'72tion. B. WATER MARKETING AUTHORITY (Article III, Sections K,D,E,F,G,I & J) (1) Summary of Compact provisions Discussion of the marketing authority provided in the Compact most ~oqica11y begins with Article III, Section K. Paragraph 1 of that Section authorizes the Tribes to transfer the right to use water "within or outside the Reservation" to the extent authorized by federal law. No other provision of the Compact restricts marketing within the Reservation, other than general requirements such as that the use not be "wasteful", Art. III 0, and the overall quantity limitations. Marketing on the Reservation i25thus free from state regulatory or administrative control. However, Paragraph 1 of Section K strictly prohibits permanent alienation of any part of the Tribal Water Right, either on or off the Reservation. Any transfers may therefore be only for a term not to exceed 50 years. No sale of the water right or any portion of the water right can ever be made by the Tribes. 25The State agreed that the Tribes could do whatever water marketing they wished on the Reservation if the diversions were made within the Reservation. (Tr. Jan. 9, 1985, pp. 128-129; Tr. Jan. 28, 1985, pp. 62-63.).