My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03082
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:42:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:32:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Section "D" General Federal Issues/Policies - Indian Water Rights
Date
4/19/1985
Title
Final Report of Tribal Negotiating Team to Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board of Fort Peck-Montana Water Compact
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Q~.,,33 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />thereafter to the Commission at the January 20, 1982 technical <br />subcommittee meeting in Los Angeles, California. The lands <br />determined to be irrigable by Stetson Engineers were shown on a <br />series of 27 maps prepared by them. <br /> <br />..";0 <br /> <br />By the March 1982 Billings meeting, the State's <br />experts had reviewed Mr. Stetson's analysis, and completed <br />their own review of Reservation lands. The State used the <br />"prime and important" land classification of the Soil <br />Conservation Service and agreed that 487,763 acres on the <br />Reservation were irrigable from the Missouri River. The State <br />decided that their studies verified the irrigable acreage <br />determined by Stetson Engineers, and ultimately accepted the <br />Stetson acreage determination. Both Stetson Engineers and the <br />State experts considered that a 300-foot elevation above the <br />Missouri River would be an economically feasible service area. <br />Therefore, the land21that were analyzed were those 'below the <br />2,300 foot contour. That covers about half the lands on the <br />Reservation, including almost all reservation lands in the <br />Poplar and Big Muddy watersheds. <br /> <br />Some of these irrigable acres on the Reservation are <br />owned today by non-Indians. The Bureau of Indian Affairs did a <br />title study and concluded that 291,798 of the 501,755 <br />potenti~~ly irrigable acres are owned by the Tribes or <br />Indians or are within the Fort Peck Irrigation Project. The <br /> <br />2lThis was originally proposed by Stetson Engineers as an <br />economically feasible service area and accepted by the State. <br /> <br />Stetson Engineers also classified lands above the 2,300 <br />foot contour, as did the State, but ultimately concluded that <br />water could not economically be provided to these lands from <br />the Missouri River. The Tribes can use the Tribal Water Right <br />to irrigate these lands above 2,300 feet, and cut off new <br />non-Indian uses to do so, but the most likely sources of water <br />would be ground water or stored surface water. Storage would <br />likely be expensive. See discussion, p. 34. <br /> <br />" <br />, <br />I <br />--' <br /> <br />22As noted, "Indians" is defined in Article 111(13) of the <br />Compact to include (1) enrolled members of the Fort Peck <br />Tribes, (2) any member of a federally recognized tribe, and (3) <br />any person who holds or is recognized by the Interior <br />Department as eligible to hold trust or restricted property on <br />the Reservation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.