My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03032
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:18 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:30:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.600.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Basin Member State Info - Utah
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/7/1975
Author
Utah State Univ
Title
Colorado Regional Assessment Study - Phase One Report for the National Commission on Water Quality - Part 1 of 2 -- Title Page - end Chapter V
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />w <br />00 <br />l-" <br />en <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />and requires effluent limitations for point sources, whereas PL 93-320 <br /> <br />authorizes projects to control certain point sources and thereby assists <br /> <br />efforts at complying with water quality standards. The control measures <br /> <br />of PL 93 -320 provide an important element in the basin-wide plan being <br /> <br />developed by the Salinity Control Forum to achieve compliance with the <br /> <br />yet-to-be-specified standards for salinity and to allow the Upper Basin <br /> <br />States to develop their compact-opportioned waters. <br /> <br />Viewed in a political context. however, several oppositions can be <br /> <br />viewed between the two Acts. PL 93 -320 is designed to alleviate problems <br /> <br />with Mexico; to improve water quality in the Lowe r Basin while at the <br /> <br />same time allowing for further resource development in the Upper Basin; <br /> <br />to concentrate on controlling natural sources of pollution and only second- <br /> <br />arilyand selectively to impose restrictions on existing users; to take a <br /> <br />primarily "facilities" approach in reducing salinity; and to be implemented <br /> <br />and managed by the Bureau of Reclamation, the principal administrator <br /> <br />of the "Law of the River." These features are essentially consistent <br /> <br />with the "development orientation" of traditional Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />water institutions, and consequently, the implementation of PL 93-320 <br /> <br />is expected to encounter little opposition. PL 92-500, in contrast, is <br /> <br />perceived by many as a threat to the Upper Basin's right to develop its <br /> <br />compact-apportioned waters; as not well-suited to the unique problems <br /> <br />of the Colorado River Basin; as an interference with State responsibilities <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.