My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03024
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:15 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:29:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.100.10
Description
Colorado River Basin Colorado River Litigation - Interstate Litigation - Arizona Vs California
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/22/1982
Author
Elbert P Tuttle
Title
In the Supreme Court of the US - October Term 1981 - Report - Special Master Elbert P Tuttle
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I. CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE <br />PRACTICABLE IRRIGABILITY OF <br />LANDS IN THE UNITED STATES <br />CLAIMS ............................. 192 <br /> <br />I II. CLAIMS ASSERTED BY THE INDIAN <br />TRIBES . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .197 <br />A. CROP SUITABILITY. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .197 <br />1. Pistachios. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .198 <br />2. Almonds.......................... .203 <br />3. Figs ........ . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .218 <br />4. Table Grapes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 <br />B. CLAIMS ASSERTED BY THE ' <br />INDIVIDUAL INDIAN TRIBES .......239 <br />1. Fort Yuma Indian Reservation . . . . . . .239 <br />(a) Lands South of All-American <br />Canal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .241 <br />(b) Lands North of All-American <br />. Canal....... . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .242 <br />(i) Engineering Design and <br />Costs. . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 <br />(ii) Soil Classification. . . . . . . . . . . 248 <br />(c) Conclusions Regarding Practicable <br />Irrigability of the Fort Yuma <br />Indian Reservation Lands .......254 <br />2. Fort Mojave Indian Reservation. . . . . . 254 <br />(a) Arability Questions ............. 254 <br />(i) Low Moisture-Holding <br />Capacity.................. .254 <br />(ii) Other Alleged Soils <br />Deficiencies............... .259 <br />(iii) Other Arizona Lands .......262 <br />(b) Conclusions Regarding Practicable <br />Irrigability of Fort Mojave Indian <br />Reservation Lands............. .263 <br /> <br />3. Colorado River Indian Reservation '" 267 <br />(a) Arability Questions ............. 267 <br />(i) Tribes Claims. . . . .... . . . . . .267 <br />(ii) State Parties' Argument <br />Regarding Decreed Lands .. . 272 ~ <br />(b) Conclusions RegardlnlrPracticable c..., <br />~gability of Colorado River ~ <br />Indian Reservation. . . . . . . , . . . . . .272 ' .1 <br />4. Chemehuevi Indian Reservation . . . . , .274 <br />(a) Arability Questions .............274 <br />(b) Gross-to-Net Acreage Reduction 275 <br />(c) Conclusions Regarding Practicable <br />Irrigability of Chemehuevi Indian <br />Reservation Lands.....,...,... .276 <br /> <br />PART THREE <br /> <br />RECOMME~ED DECREE.,..,............. 281 <br /> <br />APPENDICES <br /> <br />APPENDIX 1. Indian Reservation Boundary <br />Determinations .. .. .. .. . .. .... 285 <br /> <br />APPENDIX 2. Payment Capacity Analyses. . .. 305 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />iv <br /> <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.