My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:10 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:29:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.08
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/24/1997
Author
USDOI - Bureau of Re
Title
The Operation of Glen Canyon Dam During Spring Runoff Periods - Within the Constraints of the 1968 Colorado River Basin Project Act and the 1992 Grand Canyon Protection Act (working draft)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Reclamation would provide three scenarios for expected inflow to Lake Powell (probable <br />maximum. most probable. probable minimum) to the A~IWG. Similar infomlation is currently <br />used to inform the Colorado Rj"er ~vlanagement Work Group within the Annual Operating Plan <br />process. <br /> <br />The Technical Work Group. the GCMRC. and other participating scientists. would prepare and <br />consider a set of potential spring release scenarios for Glen Canyon Dam based on: a) normal. <br />high, and low int10w predictions. b) the risks of powerplant bypasses. and c) the information on <br />the current reservoir and Grand Canyon ecosystem conditions. The objective of these scenarios <br />is to simultaneously meet both dam safety and downstream ecosystem considerations. <br /> <br />The AMWG would then meet to discuss and prepare recommendations on release scenarios for a <br />range of spring inflows. These recommendations would be included in the AMWG annual <br />report to the Secretary and be available for use in the concurrent AOP process. Actual decisions <br />on dam releases would remain with Reclamation based on the current hydrology and the <br />recommendations for meeting statutory goals and objectives as provided to Reclamation. <br /> <br />Process for Mutual Implementation of the 1968 Act and GCP A <br /> <br />Initial Questions <br /> <br />- What is the proces~ for deciding on releases? <br />- Who should have input in making these decisions? <br />- How is information transferred to interested parties? <br />- How do we receive comments on our proposed actions related to GCPA? <br /> <br />L Decisionmaking entity <br /> <br />The Secretary of the Interior has the responsibility for the operation of Glen Canyon Dam in <br />accordance with existing statutes and compacts. He has delegated this responsibility to the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. While basic operational parameters should be broadly discussed within <br />both the AOP work group and potentials for changing parameters among the AMWG. a single <br />decisionmaker is essential to the safe and timely real-time operation of the dam. Decisions by a <br />committee would not be responsive for the day-to-day decisions that are required for reservoir <br />operations. <br /> <br />This necessity does not imply that Reclamation need not consider the viewpoints of the various <br />public interests; in fact, statutory requirements make this consideration part of the AOP process. <br />Further discussion should occur about the possible scenarios that might occur in the future and <br />how best to cope with these scenarios. <br /> <br />Reclamation Discussion Paper -- Working Draft -- 3/24/97 version <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.