Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />]0 <br /> <br />4, Linkage and coordination between GCPA and AOP issues <br /> <br />As was the case with the 1996 test of the Beach/Habitat Building Flow, there can be interaction <br />between the AMWG and AOP work group with respect to legal or policy issues. This is <br />especially true when proposed operations to benefit the Grand Canyon seem to conflict with <br />interpretations of other statutes. Likewise, some broader AOP issues such as surplus <br />determinations could have significant effects on reservoir or canyon resources. <br /> <br />We view the two groups as both operating on important topics. Broader allocation issues will <br />likely originate in the AOP arena while canyon resource issues likely will likely originate in the <br />AMWG. Major discussion items originating in either group should be coordinated with the <br />other group. Since many individuals are involved in both groups this should not be difficult. In <br />all cases, Reclamation will continue its role as the Secretary's operating entity at Glen Canyon <br />Dam. <br /> <br />Reclamation Discussion Paper -- Working Draft -- 3/24/97 version <br />