Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MWSI Project <br />Phase II Conjunctive Use Summary Report - DRAFT <br /> <br />August 22, 1995 <br /> <br />expected to be incurred in any given project year. The present value cost in the last column of <br />the analysis spreadsheet is the single payment worth factor (I/( I +i)n) applied to costs for each <br />year and summed to present value where i is the discount rate of five percent and n is the year <br />since the project began, <br /> <br />The average year one capital cost per acre foot and the net present value operation and <br />maintenance cost per 1000 gallons for project years two to twenty were calculated for the <br />northern and southern well fields, The weighted arithmetic average of year one capital costs <br />($1 AF) is also presented for each wellfield. The year one capital costs for the northern and <br />southern well fields are shown on the following table, <br /> <br />Year One Capital Costs for Northern and Southern Wellfields <br /> <br />Aquifer <br />Denver <br />Upper Arapahoe <br />Lower Arapahoe <br />Arapahoe <br />Laramie-Fox Hills <br />Weighted Average <br /> <br />Northern Wellfield ($IAF) <br />$1,914 <br />$2,949 <br />$2,566 <br />n/a <br />$2,487 <br />$2,469 <br /> <br />Southern Wellfield ($IAF) <br />$1,553 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />$1,553 <br />$2,211 <br />$1,671 <br /> <br />The results of the northern and southern well field analyses show that it is less expensive <br />to develop Denver Basin aquifer groundwater in the southern portion of the basin. The reason <br />for the less expensive cost in the southern part of the basin is that wells in the southern portion of <br />the basin are capable of producing more water than wells in the north, Therefore, fewer wells are <br />required in the south, In addition to well drilling and equipping costs, fewer wells result in lower <br />pipeline and power line costs. <br /> <br />The analysis which evaluated Denver Basin groundwater production between northern <br />and southern well fields in the metro area concluded that groundwater production is more cost <br />effective in the southern metro area, A second cost analysis was perfonned to detennin'e if it was <br />more cost effective to pump Denver Basin aquifer groundwater from (I) Denver, Arapahoe and <br />Laramie-Fox Hills aquifers; (2) the Denver and Arapahoe aquifers; or (3) only the Arapahoe <br />aquifer. To evaluate these alternatives, costs for a 30,000 affyr well field in the southern metro <br />area were prepared for each alternative. The following table shows the volume of water and <br />number of wells related to each alternative. <br /> <br />7 <br />