My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03001
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:07 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:29:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.850
Description
Metro Water Supply Investigation - MWSI
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
8/1/1995
Author
Hydrosphere, HRS
Title
Phase II Conjunctive Use Summary Report - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MWSI Project <br />Phase II Conjunctive Use Summary Report - DRAFT <br /> <br />August 22, 1995 <br /> <br />expected to be incurred in any given project year. The present value cost in the last column of <br />the analysis spreadsheet is the single payment worth factor (I/( I +i)n) applied to costs for each <br />year and summed to present value where i is the discount rate of five percent and n is the year <br />since the project began, <br /> <br />The average year one capital cost per acre foot and the net present value operation and <br />maintenance cost per 1000 gallons for project years two to twenty were calculated for the <br />northern and southern well fields, The weighted arithmetic average of year one capital costs <br />($1 AF) is also presented for each wellfield. The year one capital costs for the northern and <br />southern well fields are shown on the following table, <br /> <br />Year One Capital Costs for Northern and Southern Wellfields <br /> <br />Aquifer <br />Denver <br />Upper Arapahoe <br />Lower Arapahoe <br />Arapahoe <br />Laramie-Fox Hills <br />Weighted Average <br /> <br />Northern Wellfield ($IAF) <br />$1,914 <br />$2,949 <br />$2,566 <br />n/a <br />$2,487 <br />$2,469 <br /> <br />Southern Wellfield ($IAF) <br />$1,553 <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />$1,553 <br />$2,211 <br />$1,671 <br /> <br />The results of the northern and southern well field analyses show that it is less expensive <br />to develop Denver Basin aquifer groundwater in the southern portion of the basin. The reason <br />for the less expensive cost in the southern part of the basin is that wells in the southern portion of <br />the basin are capable of producing more water than wells in the north, Therefore, fewer wells are <br />required in the south, In addition to well drilling and equipping costs, fewer wells result in lower <br />pipeline and power line costs. <br /> <br />The analysis which evaluated Denver Basin groundwater production between northern <br />and southern well fields in the metro area concluded that groundwater production is more cost <br />effective in the southern metro area, A second cost analysis was perfonned to detennin'e if it was <br />more cost effective to pump Denver Basin aquifer groundwater from (I) Denver, Arapahoe and <br />Laramie-Fox Hills aquifers; (2) the Denver and Arapahoe aquifers; or (3) only the Arapahoe <br />aquifer. To evaluate these alternatives, costs for a 30,000 affyr well field in the southern metro <br />area were prepared for each alternative. The following table shows the volume of water and <br />number of wells related to each alternative. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.