Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C:l <br />,) <br />'":l <br />- <br />c:T.l <br />oo,J <br /> <br />The Recovery Program has five principal elements: (I) habitat management through provision <br />of instream flows, (2) habitat development and maintenance through non-flow options, (3) <br />stocking of native fish species, (4) management of non-native species and sportfishing, and (5) <br />research, monitoring, and data management. A critical element is the appropriation lacquisition <br />and protection of instream flows required for the recovery of the species. With regards to (I), <br />habitat management through provision of instream flows, the Recovery Program has conducted <br />a number of studies to develop flow recommendations in the mainstem Colorado River, Yampa <br />River, and Green River, which would contribute to the protection and maintenance of endangered <br />fish habitat. <br /> <br />As directed by the Recovery Program, the Service is required to conduct flow quantification <br />studies to provide instream flow recommendations which will be submitted to the state water <br />resources agencies for review, approval and implementation. Under this process, flow <br />recommendations have currently been developed by the Service in three separate studies using <br />a variety of flow methodologies on the Colorado and Yampa Rivers in Colorado. These <br />recommendations were for the IS-Mile Reach of the Colorado River, extending from about <br />Palisade to the confluence with the Gunnison River; and the Yampa River from Craig, Colorado <br />to the Colorado-Utah Stateline. Future studies will be conducted on the White, Dolores and <br />Gunnison Rivers, <br /> <br />The Recovery Program also outlines the procedures for Section 7 consultations of the Endangered <br />Species Act (ESA). Under section 7 of the ESA, the Service is required to consult with other <br />federal agencies to insure that any action authorized, funded or carried out by such agencies is <br />not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species, or result <br />in destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat of such species. Those actions include <br />issuance of permits and licenses to other entities or individuals. <br /> <br />In order to ensure whether progress toward recovery of the fish is sufficient to allow for <br />continued issuance of favorable biological opinions by the Service on various water projects, a <br />number of agreements have been developed. These agreements clarify how the Recovery <br />Program suffices as the reasonable and prudent alternative to offset jeopardy biological opinions <br />on depletion impacts related to new and existing water projects in the Upper Basin. These <br />agreements include the Enforcement and Protection of Water and Water Rights and Section 7 <br />Consultation, Sufficient Progress and Historic Projects Agreementsl. <br /> <br />1 "Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife <br />Service and the Colorado Water Conservation Board concerning the Enforcement and Protcction of Water and Water <br />Rights", (Enforcement Agreement) adopted by the Board in September 21, 1993, "Section 7 Consultation, Sufficient <br />Progress, and Historic Projects Agreement", accepted by the Recovery Program October 15, 1993, <br /> <br />2 <br />