My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02977
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP02977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.100
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1974
Title
The Zimmerman Farm
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c..-, <br />00 <br />~ <br />c' <br />~") <br /> <br />-'. <br />~... <br /> <br />THE ZIMMERMAN FARM <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board has compl,=ted the second <br />year's operation of a trickle irrigation demonstration on the Zimmerman <br />farm. The irrigation system is much the saL1e as described in our <br />previous report to the Four Corners Regional Connnission, who sponsored <br />part of the installation in 1973. <br /> <br />Two changes were incorporated in the system. One, a second 2 HP <br />pump was installed to overcome the head loss from the addition of a <br />water meter. Secondly, a 3-inch PVC syphon was installed to increase <br />the supply volume from the 2-inch po11yethelyne line used in the 1973 <br />season. (Note: The PVC was found to be too porous for use as a syphon <br />and was eventually replaced by a 3-inch suction hose.,) <br /> <br />The system was operated daily to replace the water used by the trees. <br />Two tensiometers were placed one foot away from emitters and they were <br />kept just below the 20% saturation point. Line pressures were maintained <br />at 15 psi except for the upper side of the orchard, "hich was kept at <br />near 20 psi to compensate for line drainage. The upper end of the orchard <br />did not produce as well as expected in 1973, and. because of the poorer <br />soil, it was decided to increase the water applied to that area by 10%. <br />Total water applied. to the orchard. was 1.3 AF/AC. <br /> <br />For the 1973 season the fertilizer had been applied. by the operator <br />in the Fall of 1972. In 1974 we began to look at the, nutritional needs <br />of the plant by having a leaf analysis performed at the C.S.U, Austin <br />Station. The results showed that there was a deficiency in the uptake of <br />nitrogen. <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />P <br /> <br />K <br /> <br />Fe <br /> <br />Mn <br /> <br />Zn <br /> <br />Upper <br /> <br />2.03 <br /> <br />.080 <br /> <br />1.00 <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />Lower <br /> <br />1.77 <br /> <br />.135 <br /> <br />1.38 <br /> <br />55 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />In the Fall of 1973, one half pound of nitrogen per tree was applied <br />through the system. We were at the point of adding another one half <br />pound of nitrogen per tree in the Spring of 1974 when the leaf samples <br />showed the nitrogen uptake of the trees to be in excess of the normal <br />amount. <br /> <br />Upper <br /> <br />N <br />4.70 <br /> <br />P <br />.336 <br /> <br />K <br />2.05 <br /> <br />Fe <br /> <br />Mn <br /> <br />Zn <br /> <br />82 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />Lower <br /> <br />4.76 <br /> <br />.360 <br /> <br />2.38 <br /> <br />83 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.