My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02976
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP02976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:28:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1979
Title
An Economic Evaluation of the Salinity Impacts From Energy Development - The Case of the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~1 <br />N <br />N <br />....1 <br /> <br />animal unit month (AUM) of pasture are used <br />(updated from Willis 1974). <br /> <br /> <br />V. DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR THE <br />AGRICULTURAL SECTOR <br /> <br />Agricultural Land Use and Production <br /> <br />Livestock and livestock products are the <br />major agricultural activity in the Upper <br />Colorado region. Approximately 75 percent of <br />agricultural sales are livestock and live- <br />stock products, while sales of field crops, <br />fruits, and vegetables account for 25 percent <br />(U.S. Water Resources Council 1971). Crops <br />in the basin are primarily foraf!e and feed <br />for the livestock industry. Out of 2,208,283 <br />acres of total field croplands in 1974, only <br />51.8 percent were irrigated. The major crops <br />grown on irrigated land were hay, pasture, <br />corD silage, and small grains. Alfalfa hay <br />and native haVe the main hay crops in the <br />region use about 58 percent of the irrigated <br />land. Pasture and small grains were ranked <br />second and third in acreage of irrigated <br />land. Barley and wheat were the primary <br />grains for feed and brewery. Because of <br />similarities in water consumptive use and <br />irrigation practices, native hay and pasture <br />are aggregated. For modeling purposes, <br />pasture and all hay except alfalfa lands are <br />called pasture land and the rest is called <br />cropland. These lands (shown in Table 11) <br />are used as the base for comparison of future <br />development. The projection of future <br />irrigation development is based on authorized <br />projects as reported by the U. S. Department <br />of the Interior (1977) and presented in <br />Table 4. The Dew irrigated land is assumed <br />to be used as cropland. <br /> <br />Most of the crops are sold to the local <br />dairy industry and to cattle and sheep <br />ranches. There is some importation of feed <br />for livestock. The annual prices of crops in <br />the four states reported by U. S. Department <br />of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service <br />(1974) are shown in Table 13. <br /> <br />The price of corn silage and pasture <br />were not reported. An estimated price of <br />$17.20 per ton of corn silage and $5.19 per <br /> <br />In order to estimate the net return per <br />acre of irri,eated land, the productivity <br />(yield per acre) a~d cost of producinf <br />irrigated crops must be presented. Crop <br />yields per acre depend on the type of soil, <br />weather, water, and farm practices. The data <br />for crop yields and cost of production <br />(Tables l4 and l5) are derived from U. s. <br />Water Resources Council (l97l), Wright et al. <br />(1972), Davis et a1. (1975), and Olsen <br />(1977). Alfalfa hay is divided into alfalfa <br />full and alfalfa partial irrigated. Alfalfa <br />full consumes more water and its yield is <br />higher than alfalfa partial. <br /> <br />The cost data are updated and adjusted <br />to 1974 price levels by using index numbers <br />of prices paid by farmers (Economic Report of <br />the President 1977). <br /> <br />The dollar value of net return per acre <br />of irrigated land is derived by substracting <br />total variable cost from total revenue. This <br />is used as a net return coefficient in the <br />objective function (shown in Table l6). <br />However, the nature of irrigated pasture and <br />the assumption of pasture land in this report <br />made the estimate of net return on pasture <br />land difficult. Irrigated pasture can be <br />under rotation (cropland), permanent (non- <br />cropland), or other. All other hay can be <br />either improved or native hay (U.S. Water <br />Resources Council 1971). Alfalfa can be <br />grown separately or mixed with grass and <br />legumes. Native grasses grown on grazing <br />land is widely seen in the Intermountain <br />West. Different pasture types produce <br />different nutritional mixes and result in <br />different net returns when compared with the <br />return on beef production. Properly managed <br />pastures can bring a net return of $25.00 to <br />$l64.00 per acre, including credit for labor <br />(Acord 1970). Since pasture land in this <br />study includes all other hay which generally <br />has a higher value than pasture itself, the <br />average net return of $87.35 per acre is <br />selected to represent the net return on <br />pasture. <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.