|
<br />C.I,)
<br />1-"
<br />W
<br />C,O'
<br />
<br />I, INTRODUCTION
<br />
<br />Present national energy policies
<br />em ph as ize reduc t ion of U. S. dependence on
<br />imported energy through higher rates of
<br />domestic production. Strong economic
<br />incentives and rising energy prices will
<br />stimulate through increased profitability
<br />the development of domestic energy resources.
<br />In the western states, the Upper Colorado
<br />River Basin, with its vast deposits of coal,
<br />oil, natural gas, uranium, tar sands, and oil
<br />shale, is consequently faced with large-scale
<br />development.
<br />
<br />Water is required for development of
<br />these energy reso~rces. It is necessary for
<br />all aspects of energy production, including
<br />mining, reclamation of mined lands, pro-
<br />cessing, refining, conversion, and distri-
<br />bution. In addition, water will be needed
<br />for the associated growth of population,
<br />commercial and service sectors, and for
<br />the development of other industries in the
<br />region. Thus, the increased production of
<br />energy resources is expected to increase the
<br />demand for water substantially.
<br />
<br />Concern as to whether the needed water
<br />will be available to sustain energy develop-
<br />ment and associated economic activities has
<br />stimulated a number of "water for energy"
<br />studies for the western states. Studies to
<br />date (U. S. Bureau of Reclamation 1974a,
<br />Davis and Wood 1974, Utah Division of Water
<br />Resources 1973, Federal Energy Administration
<br />1974, U. S. Department of the Interior 1974,
<br />U. S. water Resources Council 1974, and
<br />Western States Water Council 1974) have taken
<br />an inventory approach, itemizing proposed
<br />energy projects and determining the availa-
<br />bility of water to meet ,the estimated needs.
<br />The general conclusion with regard to water
<br />ava ilability in the Upper Colorado River
<br />Basin (U. S. Department of the Interior 1974)
<br />is, according to available data,
<br />
<br />.. .the water supply exceeds
<br />that which is presently being
<br />utilized in the Basin. However
<br />it is also apparent that the
<br />supply is in turn exceeded by
<br />the presently recognized rights
<br />to utilize water which has been
<br />granted by most of the states in
<br />the Basin.
<br />
<br />Therefore, the availability of water for
<br />the production of energy and to supply the
<br />needs of associated users will depend on the
<br />
<br />ability of the energy industries and associ-
<br />ated users to acquire the necessary water
<br />rights through various transfer mechanisms.
<br />Small quantities of water may be as yet
<br />uncommitted and can be obtained through legal
<br />appropriation procedures. Water that has
<br />already been appropriated by others will have
<br />to be purchased for energy uses. To the
<br />extent that economic cons iderat ions govern
<br />this transfer, the pUTchases will come from
<br />existing uses where the marginal product of
<br />water is relatively low.
<br />
<br />Various institutional constraints may
<br />shift the transfer to uses with higher
<br />marginal products. For example, compli-
<br />cations may arise in acquiring water held by
<br />the federal government and native American
<br />Tribes. Additional legal and institutional
<br />constraints are found in interstate and
<br />intrastate obligat ions, Upper-Lower Bas in
<br />compacts, and U. S .-Mexican treaties. These
<br />have to be regarded as social property rights
<br />to which any reallocation schemes should
<br />conform. The free market system, as a
<br />vehicle to promote intersectoral mobility of
<br />water under these institutional restraints,
<br />promotes economic eff iciency if there are no
<br />third-party effects.
<br />
<br />However, the pattern of water allocation
<br />may have an important third-party effect by
<br />impacting water quality of the Colorado
<br />River. Higher consumptive use of the
<br />presently unutilized water upstream on the
<br />one hand, can increase concentrations of
<br />certain constituents through reduction
<br />in streamflow and consequent dilution possi-
<br />bilities. On the other hand, changes in the
<br />water use, as well as wastewater management
<br />of the users, may alter waste loading in the
<br />river giving rise to water quality changes.
<br />
<br />Salinity is recognized as one of the
<br />major problems of the Colorado River.
<br />Although salinity does not cause major damage
<br />to water users in the Upper Colorado River
<br />Basin, the high total dissolved solid (TDS)
<br />levels in the river impose signif~cant
<br />damages on the industrial, municipal, and
<br />agricultural users in the Lower Basin.
<br />Higher salinity levels in irrigation water
<br />cause crop damage, reduction of soil pro-
<br />ductivity, and increased demand for water for
<br />leaching. In municipal and industrial uses,
<br />salinity causes higher treatment costs, pipe
<br />erosion and scaling, and greater use of
<br />detergents and chemicals. The total damage
<br />
<br />
|