Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C.I,) <br />1-" <br />W <br />C,O' <br /> <br />I, INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Present national energy policies <br />em ph as ize reduc t ion of U. S. dependence on <br />imported energy through higher rates of <br />domestic production. Strong economic <br />incentives and rising energy prices will <br />stimulate through increased profitability <br />the development of domestic energy resources. <br />In the western states, the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin, with its vast deposits of coal, <br />oil, natural gas, uranium, tar sands, and oil <br />shale, is consequently faced with large-scale <br />development. <br /> <br />Water is required for development of <br />these energy reso~rces. It is necessary for <br />all aspects of energy production, including <br />mining, reclamation of mined lands, pro- <br />cessing, refining, conversion, and distri- <br />bution. In addition, water will be needed <br />for the associated growth of population, <br />commercial and service sectors, and for <br />the development of other industries in the <br />region. Thus, the increased production of <br />energy resources is expected to increase the <br />demand for water substantially. <br /> <br />Concern as to whether the needed water <br />will be available to sustain energy develop- <br />ment and associated economic activities has <br />stimulated a number of "water for energy" <br />studies for the western states. Studies to <br />date (U. S. Bureau of Reclamation 1974a, <br />Davis and Wood 1974, Utah Division of Water <br />Resources 1973, Federal Energy Administration <br />1974, U. S. Department of the Interior 1974, <br />U. S. water Resources Council 1974, and <br />Western States Water Council 1974) have taken <br />an inventory approach, itemizing proposed <br />energy projects and determining the availa- <br />bility of water to meet ,the estimated needs. <br />The general conclusion with regard to water <br />ava ilability in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin (U. S. Department of the Interior 1974) <br />is, according to available data, <br /> <br />.. .the water supply exceeds <br />that which is presently being <br />utilized in the Basin. However <br />it is also apparent that the <br />supply is in turn exceeded by <br />the presently recognized rights <br />to utilize water which has been <br />granted by most of the states in <br />the Basin. <br /> <br />Therefore, the availability of water for <br />the production of energy and to supply the <br />needs of associated users will depend on the <br /> <br />ability of the energy industries and associ- <br />ated users to acquire the necessary water <br />rights through various transfer mechanisms. <br />Small quantities of water may be as yet <br />uncommitted and can be obtained through legal <br />appropriation procedures. Water that has <br />already been appropriated by others will have <br />to be purchased for energy uses. To the <br />extent that economic cons iderat ions govern <br />this transfer, the pUTchases will come from <br />existing uses where the marginal product of <br />water is relatively low. <br /> <br />Various institutional constraints may <br />shift the transfer to uses with higher <br />marginal products. For example, compli- <br />cations may arise in acquiring water held by <br />the federal government and native American <br />Tribes. Additional legal and institutional <br />constraints are found in interstate and <br />intrastate obligat ions, Upper-Lower Bas in <br />compacts, and U. S .-Mexican treaties. These <br />have to be regarded as social property rights <br />to which any reallocation schemes should <br />conform. The free market system, as a <br />vehicle to promote intersectoral mobility of <br />water under these institutional restraints, <br />promotes economic eff iciency if there are no <br />third-party effects. <br /> <br />However, the pattern of water allocation <br />may have an important third-party effect by <br />impacting water quality of the Colorado <br />River. Higher consumptive use of the <br />presently unutilized water upstream on the <br />one hand, can increase concentrations of <br />certain constituents through reduction <br />in streamflow and consequent dilution possi- <br />bilities. On the other hand, changes in the <br />water use, as well as wastewater management <br />of the users, may alter waste loading in the <br />river giving rise to water quality changes. <br /> <br />Salinity is recognized as one of the <br />major problems of the Colorado River. <br />Although salinity does not cause major damage <br />to water users in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin, the high total dissolved solid (TDS) <br />levels in the river impose signif~cant <br />damages on the industrial, municipal, and <br />agricultural users in the Lower Basin. <br />Higher salinity levels in irrigation water <br />cause crop damage, reduction of soil pro- <br />ductivity, and increased demand for water for <br />leaching. In municipal and industrial uses, <br />salinity causes higher treatment costs, pipe <br />erosion and scaling, and greater use of <br />detergents and chemicals. The total damage <br /> <br />