My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02975
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP02975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:28:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co Limestone Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
2/9/1994
Author
Gronning Engineering
Title
Ft Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study Conceptual Design of Fort Lyon Water Bank
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1886 <br /> <br />4t ... '. ...~, <br /> <br />Table 8.1 <br />Temporary Transfer Yield (1) <br /> <br /> 1950-1985 Factors % <br /> (at) (aflshare) (2) <br />Diversions (2) , 222,919 2.37 100.0 <br />Return Flows 60,088 0.64 26.96 <br />Main Canal- Consumable Loss 35,115 0.37 15.75 <br />Lateral Canals" 8,256 0.09 3.70 <br />Consumable Loss <br />Fry-Ark water neg. 0.0 Neg <br />Transferable Yield 119,460 1.27 53.59 <br />1. Table 3.7 and Table A3.5; based upon 93,989 shares. <br />2. Computed without Fry-Ark water. Adjusted average diversions = 224,203 - 1284 Fry-Ark. <br />- All participating shareholders leave this per~nt in the main canal. Losses from the <br /> storage canal are included in this quantity. , <br />.. Shareholders on laterals would leave about 4% of their diversion in the lateral to <br /> mitigate lateral loss for the other lateral shareholders. Lateral companies could be <br /> evaluated individually. <br /> <br />Diversions are defined as all water historically and actu~lly diverted and measured through the FLCC <br />headgates. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project (Fry-Ark) water is also diverted at the FLCC headgate, but <br />has been factored out and is not included in the distri~ution analysis. Shareholders may not pledge <br />Fry-Ark water to the water bank and may not apply Ery-Ark water to lands designated as fallowed <br />under the FLWB program. Refer to Section 8.4. ' <br /> <br />Demand of New Users <br /> <br />Temporary transfer of FLCC water requires that new users, herein called "renters", be identified. <br />In this operational analysis, water may be delivered anywhere on the river below Pueblo ReselVoir. <br />Due to the method of computing yield explained prevIously, the consumptive use portion of FL WB <br />water is totally consumable and not subject to retur~ flow analysis. Water may be used for any <br />beneficial use. The renter has the obligation to capture the water at the designated point of <br />diversion and to cooperate with the administrative offICials responsible for the river. As an example, <br />5,000 af may be needed as a new, temporary water supply for a small processing industry at La Junta. <br />Water bank water will be provided at a constant rate to be diverted either at a surface structure or <br />a well acting as an alternate point of diversion at a poillt 4.2 river miles below the FL main headgate. <br />River transit loss will be added to the release (next paragraph). The example delivery requirements <br />are presented in Table 8.2. This example is one of the simpler possible uses of the FLWB; more <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />8-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.