Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lan3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The following minimum bypass requirements at the various diversion <br />points were used during the 1988 operation: <br /> <br />Diversion point <br /> <br />Minimum bypass <br />requirement <br />(ft3/s) - <br /> <br />12 <br />6 <br />3 <br />o <br />o <br />3 <br />1 <br />1 <br />o <br />2 <br />12 <br />5 <br />4 <br />2 <br />1 <br />o <br /> <br />Fryin9pan River <br />South Fork <br />Chapman Gulch <br />Sawyer Lake Creek <br />Lily Pad Creek <br />I vanhoe Creek <br />Middle Cunningham Creek <br />North Cunningham Creek <br />South Cunningham Creek <br />Mormon Creek <br />Hunter Creek <br />Midway Creek <br />No Name Creek <br />Carter Creek <br />North Fork Creek <br />Granite Creek <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In addition to the minimum bypass requirements at each of these sites, <br />a minimum flow requirement must be met on the Fryingpan River at <br />Thomasvi11e river gaging station as specified in the Operating <br />Principles. This minimum requirement is as follows: April - 100 ft3/s, <br />May - 150 ft3/s, June - 200 ft3/s, July - 100 ft3/s, August - 75 ft3/s, <br />and September - 70 ft3/s or the natural flow, whichever is less. <br /> <br />When it appears that these flows wi 11 not be met, the divers ions into <br />the Project system are decreased or stopped, whichever is necessary to <br />meet the bypass requirements. The Hunter Creek System, which drains <br />into the Roaring Fork River, can continue diverting water into <br />Boustead Tunnel during these times. <br /> <br />Exhibit 4 shows the daily flows at the Thomasville River gaging <br />station and the average daily minimum flow requirements during the <br />period of diversions from the Fryingpan River. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />C. PrOject Diversions <br /> <br />The water year 1988 outlook used a Project diversion of <br />3,000 acre-feet for the most probable runoff condition. The March 1, <br />April 1, and May 1 forecasts, based on Soil Conservation Service snow <br />course data, projected available diversions of 45,000 acre-feet, <br />33,500 acre-feet, and 25,300 acre-feet, respectively. Due to restricted <br />space in the East Slope storage system, only the Twin Lakes Reservoir <br /> <br />7 <br />