My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02940
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02940
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.C.4
Description
UCRBRIP Flooded Bottom Lands
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/15/1995
Author
USFWS
Title
Potential for Nonnative Fishes to Occupy and/or Benefit from Enhanced or Restored Floodplain Habitat and Adversely Impact the Razorback Sucker
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />fishes. Selection of this option would be based on the assumption that <br />endangered species can be recovered by implementing measures other than <br />floodplain restoration. <br /> <br />2. Install additional levees/dikes to prevent use of floodplain habitats by <br />nonnative fishes. <br /> <br />This option assumes that, if nonnative fishes would use and/or benefit <br />from restoration of floodplain habitats, then existing floodplain <br />habitats should be "walled-off" to prevent their use by nonnatives. <br />However, some nonnative fishes are also abundant in main-channel <br />slackwater habitats. It is not feasible to "wall-off" all backwaters, <br />embayments, and tributary mouths to prevent nonnatives from using or <br />benefitting from those habitats. Such measures would result in a river <br />that resembles a concrete-lined canal where the numbers of all fish <br />species would be reduced. <br /> <br />3. Restore sites only in locations where there are no "problematic" <br />nonnative fishes. <br /> <br />All parts of the Upper Basin contain some "problematic" nonnative fish <br />species. Some biologists believe that, wherever habitat is enhanced or <br />restored, nonnative fishes will use them. The response of fishes to <br />newly created habitats will vary among the various species, <br /> <br />4. Control access to (and from) restored sites by nonnative fishes <br /> <br />There are two degrees of control for nonnative fishes: total and <br />partial. Total control can be accomplished only if the habitat is <br />totally isolated from the main channel of the river. In this case, the <br />habitat (e.g., pond or hatchery) could be drained or poisoned to remove <br />all fishes; then stocked with razorbacks for rearing. <br /> <br />One means of partial control can be accomplished via inlet and outlet <br />screens, which prevent access to the habitat by larger fishes, but <br />permit access to early life stages of fishes. During high flow years, <br />however, the screens, dikes, and levees can be breached or over-topped, <br />allowing access to any or all species and sizes of fish. <br /> <br />Another technique for partial control is to install an outlet control <br />structure with a fish kettle. This allows draining the habitat back <br />into the river through a screen, and harvesting all of the fishes, <br />Nonnative fishes can then be removed from the kettle, thereby preventing <br />them from getting into the river. <br /> <br />A third approach for partial control involves restoring and managing <br />floodplain habitats to behave naturally. Habitats would be allowed to <br />flood and drain during spring flows, providing ephemeral floodplain <br />habitats. Nonnative fishes may use the habitats for the relatively <br />short period of time in which they are inundated, but they would not be <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.