Laserfiche WebLink
<br />043G <br /> <br />(Area X) would in our jlldgment qualify as being either pervious or reasonably resistant <br />to piping erosion. <br />6. In view of the reported considerable thickness (50 to 70 ft.) of fine alluvium <br />above the present ground water table for over 3.5 mi. along the right abutment a."ds, <br />and considering the reported alluvial fan mode of deposition of that alluvium, it seems <br />probable that significantly large total foundation settlements and potentially damaging <br />differential settlements should be anticipated along that reach of the dam upon construc- <br />tion of the dam, and most importantly upon first ponding of the reservoir against that <br />reach of the dam. <br />7. The extensive river bottom area for several miles upstream from the dam- <br />site appeared to have substantial potential as a source of sand and gravel, recoverable <br />by dredging. Subsequent review of exploratory data showed the riverbed sand to be <br />from 10 to 30 ft. thick, to be fairly clean, and to average 16% coarser than a No, 4 <br />screen. <br /> <br />8. No source of clean, directly usable gravel was shown to us, although some of <br />the geologic reports indicate the presence of several gravel deposits within 10 miles of <br />the damsite. It is our view that a substantial volume of clean, very pervious gravel <br />should be called for in the final design of the embankment, and hence further efforts to <br />define and inventory gravel deposits, both as to quantity and nature, seem highly justi- <br />fied. <br /> <br />9. There appeared to be practically unlimited quantities of impervious core <br />borrow along the broad bench north of the rhoer and upstream from the damsite. Like- <br />wise, there appeared to be practiCally unlimited quantities of random, fine, silty sandy <br />borrow on the flats south of the river. The latter borrow, however, appeared to us to <br />be of such a nature that it would be relatively brittle when normally compacted, and <br />relatively sensitive to piping. Hence, it should be utilized cautiously, in locations of <br />the dam cross section where it can be fully protected against potential piping. <br />GENERAL COMMENTS <br />In its simplest form, the question being raised at this time is whether, at the <br />proposed Narrows damsite, a safe foundation exists and whether a safe earthfill <br /> <br />6. <br />