Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter I <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Purpose <br /> <br />This document updates the status of the <br />Title I program of the Colorado River Basin <br />Salinity Control Act (Title I)-as authorized <br />by Public Law 93-320 and amended by <br />Public Law 96-336 (appendix A)-and sets <br />forth an action plan for future activities. <br />This document reviews the history and <br />provisions of Title I; provides an update on <br />its major works; sUIlllllarizes construction <br />and operation, maintenance, replacement, <br />and energy costs (OMR&E); and evaluates <br />the ability of Title I to support its objectives. <br />This document also satisfies the Title I <br />portions of a September 1990 agreement <br />between the Bureau of Reclamation <br />(Reclamation) and the Office ofInspector <br />General (OIG). The agreement was reached <br />to resolve the recoIlllllendations contained <br />in a 1989 OIG survey audit report on the <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control <br />Program. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />In its report, OIG expressed concern about <br />(1) the ability of the Title I program to meet <br />its objective of providing Mexico with <br />Colorado River water that meets negotiated <br />salinity standards without depriving the <br />Colorado River Basin States (Basin States) <br />of any of their apportioned water, (2) re- <br />placement of the reject stream from the <br />Yuma Desalting Plant (YDP), (3) increases <br />in projected YDP operating and capital <br />costs, and (4) alternative me8JlB of com- <br />plying with Title I salinity requirements. <br />OIG also reco=ended that Reclamation <br />"provide Congress additional information <br />upon which to judge the reasonability and <br />desirability of continuing with the Title I <br /> <br />> <br /> <br />program in its current context." The <br />portions of the audit report concerning the <br />Title II program of the Colorado River Basin <br />Salinity Control Act were addressed in <br />Quality of Water, Colorado River Basin, <br />Progress Report No. 15, a biennial report to <br />the Congress released in June 1991. (See <br />page 56, "State and Local Cooperators.") <br /> <br />Scope <br /> <br />Public Law 93-320 seeks, through a <br />program of works in the Colorado River <br />Basin, to control the salinity of water <br />delivered to users in the United States and <br />Mexico. Title I authorizes salinity control <br />projects downstream from Imperial Dam, <br />the last Colorado River diversion structure <br />in the United States. (See frontispiece <br />map.) The Title II program authorizes <br />salinity control projects upstream from <br />Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />Specifically, Title I allows the United States <br />to comply with its obligations under Minute <br />No. 242 of the International Boundary and <br />Water Commission (Minute No. 242). <br />Minute No. 242 is an extension of the 1944 <br />water treaty with Mexico to address the <br />salinity of Colorado River water delivered to <br />Mexico and to satisfy the concerns of the <br />seven Basin States of Arizona, California, <br />Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and <br />Wyoming. (See appendix B.) In enacting <br />Title I, Congress also sought to advance <br />desalting technologies through construction <br />and operation of the YDP. <br />