My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02886
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:24:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Issues
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/17/1961
Author
LeRoy R. Patterson
Title
Yardsticks or a Lesson in the New Mathematics
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br />in support of the legislation and offered to use their existing trans- <br />mission facilities and future transmission lines as might be necessary <br />to deliver project power to preference customers in the market area. <br /> <br />Recognizing the merits of these offers Congressional Committees <br />directed that the Department of Interior take cognizance of the utilities' <br />offer to a maximum degree, stating that they expected, ". . . the proposal <br />by the private power companies to be carefully considered by the Department <br />of the Interior and the electric power and energy of the Project to be <br />marketed, so far as possible, through the facilities of the electric <br />utilities operating in the area. . ." The Department of the Interior <br />advised these Congressional Committees that it was sympathetic to the <br />private power companies' proposal and indicated that if the Project were <br />authorized, the proposal would be given consideration. <br /> <br />This history is related in order to focus your attention on the <br />true intent of the legislation, that is to develop water - not power as <br />some people believe and to give the background leading up to the present <br />situation with respect to the question of whether a combination investor- <br />owned and Federal transmission system or an all-Federal transmission system <br />should be used to market project power. <br /> <br />After authorization of the Project in April, 1956 the investor- <br />owned utilities continued their engineering studies related to the trans- <br />mission facilities associated with the Colorado River Storage Project. <br /> <br />Early in 1959, Congress directed the Bureau of Reclamation to <br />confer with the investor-owned utilities in the planning of a transmission <br />system for this Project. On July 10, 1959, the Bureau invited the regional <br />electric utilities and other interested parties to meet with them and give <br />consideration to the problem of integrating the operation of the Colorado <br />River Storage Project plants with the generating and transmission facilities <br />in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming and Utah. The Bureau at this <br />meeting presented a proposed 345,000 volt single-circuit transmission system <br />for this Project. <br /> <br />After reviewing the information presented by the Bureau, engi- <br />neering studies made during the past five years by the investor-owned <br />utilities were brought up to date. On October 1, 1959 these utilities <br />presented a comprehensive plan for transporting project power to the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. On October 13, 1959, at the request of the Bureau, <br />this plan was presented to the preference power users in the area, <br /> <br />This combination plan, which is basically a multi-circuit <br />230,000 volt system provided for both utility and federal transmission <br />lines to fully utilize the present and future facilities of the area with- <br />out duplication. <br /> <br />In the latter part of 1959, these interested parties agreed to <br />make a joint engineering study of electric transmission problems related <br />to the Colorado River Storage Project. The major share of the cost of <br />this study was paid for by the five investor-owned utilities. It was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.