|
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />The plan will also consider the water::qua~lity necessaryfosupport fish
<br />communities and recreation activitie~inthe water. Generally, existing
<br />water qual ity appears to be adequatel'fo"support ~afisheri butsorrie '
<br />additional analysis may be necessariVWafer quality maybe imp'ac:ted by
<br />, wastewater plant discharges, agricu1turereturnflo\~s,~and 'sform"run-off.
<br />Increased flows may offset the impacts of these sources on water quality.
<br />It is possible that more stri ngentwater quality standards may oeass i gned
<br />to the river by the State if a fishetyis 'provided:~'It:::fs intended that'
<br />the plan address alternative approaches'toprotectihg:wat'eirqualitywhile
<br />, also maintainil1g cost-effective wast~wa'fer:trea:tment.nIt maybe, ",' ,
<br />, , appropriate for the plan to includede'lelopmentofa',waterqualily,
<br />management olan or regulation to be~~ubniitted to state 'and Federal':
<br />regulatory agencies for approval. ,," I ~,nn' :~. '
<br />! - ,
<br />Some additional special problems mayjneed to'beaddres'S-e'd "'iii the pTan. One ~
<br />such issue would be the identificati,Qn through the'Colorado'DivfSfon of
<br />~ Wildl ife of diverse manaqem:ntoptfo~s,.sUCh~-stbutncitC,lim~ted~'fo,catch
<br />and release areas, fly f1sh1ngareas,: catch 11mlts, and speclal, areas for'
<br />children. Another speciill concern m~y be pro'lfii,on fO"rhandiCapped access
<br />to river recreation areas. Other issues re'garding puol icuseniaybe ~
<br />; dent ifi ed as the pl an progresses. ' f~' ~,:,:, ',' ,:";.:"
<br />!
<br />
<br />It is possible that implementationokfheplan inayrequire changes in State'
<br />regulations and/or City ordinances'irfregard to suChissues':as'erosion
<br />control ,animal damage controls, fisHing ~restrictions,boatin~g" ",',;, '
<br />restri cti ons, and water ' quality pr'otect ion. ~ "~ ,: ..:' :;:;: ~.. c, , "",'
<br />
<br />5. STRUCTURE
<br />
<br />5.1 Committees
<br />
<br />In order to maximize the involvement bfal1 interested parties in the
<br />development of the PRCFP, a structure! of committees to oversee the
<br />development of the plan is desirable.: This structure involves two primary
<br />committees. The first is the CoordinaJ;frig Committee and includes the three
<br />primary sponsoring organizations, Roc~y Mountain Flycasters, Poudre River
<br />Trust, and the City of Fort Collins. iA second group, the Corridor
<br />Committee, will include all intereste~ parties who wish to be involved in
<br />the development of the plan. From this large group, several subcommittees
<br />will be formed to oversee specific portions of the planning effort. As the
<br />project progresses, it may be necessa/-y to hire a consultant to act as
<br />coordinator of the overall effort. FIgure One outlines this structure.
<br />
<br />, "
<br />
<br />5.2 The Coordinating Committee
<br />
<br />The Coordinating Committee shall cons~st of representatives of the three
<br />major sponsoring agencies. This committee will be responsible for the
<br />initial organization of planning effo~ts and.for cont~cting ~e~son~, .
<br />organizations, and agencies who may h~ve an 1nt7res~ 1n par~lc1pat1ng 1n
<br />the Corridor Committee. Functions of ithe Coord1natlng Comm1ttee are as
<br />fo 11 ows :
<br />
<br />6
<br />
|