My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02881
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02881
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:28 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:24:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8270.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Water Quality/Salinity -- Misc Water Quality
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/19/1977
Title
Final Environmental Statement - Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program - Volume II - Public Comment -- Part 1 of 2 -- Title Page through Page 145
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I-' <br />I-' <br />~ <br />CD .1 <br /> <br />tb{i~J <br /> <br />Replies to Comments Made by the <br />Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. <br />(Letter of May 13, 1976) <br /> <br />1.' Comment: We are concerned. however. that there is generally <br />little discussion of cooperative USDA activities for improving on-farm <br />irrigation systems and management or improving watershed conditions in <br />the basin to help reduce salt loading. USDA is participating in numer- <br />ous studies which include irrigation salt source areas. OUr quarterly <br />and annual reports to the Bureau reflect these cooperative activities. <br />When fully implemented. USDA assistance will improve irrigation effi- <br />ciency. reduce watershed erosion. and reduce the salt load to the <br />river. Therefore. we suggest that the final statement be a joint <br />USDA-USDI-EPA statement or that a USDA supplement be prepared. <br /> <br />~ePlY: Additional discussion of USDA activities dealing with onfarm <br />rrigation systems improvements and watershed management will be pro- <br />vided in the final statement. Moreover. the Final will be coauthored <br />with the Soil Conservation Service to insure full discussion of all <br />USDA onfarm activities in the Basin. <br /> <br />2. Comment: Within the Grand Valley unit. the draft EIS projects an <br />increase in irrigation efficiency from 33 percent to 60 percent result- <br />ing from the Bureau's Irrigation Management Services. We feel this is <br />unlikely. Soil Conservation Service field evaluations in this area <br />indicate that overall efficiencies of 60 percent will be very diffi- <br />cult to obtain. even with improved on-farm systems, with current tech- <br />nology and the expected level of participation by irrigators. <br /> <br />Reply: The Bureau of Reclamation believes it is possible to get <br />60 percent or better efficiency if IMS and WSI programs are strictly <br />adhered to with full cooperation of the water users. This has been <br />indicated in small, highly controlled areas. On an overall project <br />basis, without strict adherence and only partial participation, this <br />high efficiency cannot be obtained. From a standpoint of expecting <br />full cooperation and strict adherence, the high efficiency will be <br />difficult to obtain but every effort will be made to attain this goal. <br />See additional discussion in chapter II, Grand Valley Unit - section <br />D.2.b. [4], On farm Irrigation Systems and Management Improvement. <br /> <br />~~:~) <br />...."'-- <br /> <br />~~~k) <br />.;-{;;..- <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.