Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Executive Swnmary <br /> <br />In October 1992, the Congress enacted the Grand Canyon Protection Act <br />of 1992 (title XVIII of P,L. 102-575), which required the Secretary of the <br />Interior to complete the envirorunental impact statement by October 30, <br />1994. The act also required that GAO audit the costs and benefits of the <br />various operating alternatives identified in the final environmental impact <br />statement. In preparing the statement, Reclamation studied the potential <br />impact of various flow alternatives on selected resources, Reclamation <br />reported the results of these studies in the final environmental impact <br />statement on March 21, 1995, As discussed with the responsible <br />congressional committees, for the purpose of this audit, GAO examined <br />(1) whether Reclamation's impact determinations were reasonable and <br />(2) what, if any, concerns still exist about the Glen Canyon Dam's final <br />envirorunental impact statement. The act also requires that on the basis of <br />the findings, conclusions, and recommendations made in the <br />envirorunental impact statement and the GAO audit report, the Secretary is <br />to adopt criteria and operating plans for the dam. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Before the construction of the Glen Canyon Dam, the Colorado River's <br />sediment-laden flows fluctuated dramatically during different seasons of <br />the year, Annual daily flows of greater than 80,000 cubic feet per second <br />were common during the spring runoff. In contrast, flows of less than <br />3,000 cubic feet per second were typical throughout the late summer, fall, <br />and winter. Water temperatures ranged from near freezing in the winter to <br />more than 80 degrees Fahrenheit in the summer. The construction of the <br />Glen Canyon Dam altered the natural dynamics of the Colorado River <br />corridor through the Glen and Grand canyons, The dam replaced the <br />dramatic seasonal flow variations with significant daily fluctuations, <br />greatly reduced the amount of sediment in the water, and resulted in <br />nearly constant water release temperatures of about 46 degrees <br />Fahrenheit. <br /> <br />As early as 1982, the Secretary of the Interior initiated the Glen Canyon <br />Envirorunental Studies of the effects of the dam. These studies were led by <br />Reclamation and conducted by a number of different agencies, In 1989, the <br />Secretary designated Reclamation as the lead agency in preparing an <br />envirorunental impact statement. Other agencies and individuals <br />participated in these efforts, including federal and state resource agencies, <br />Indian tribes, private consultants, universities, and river guides, To protect <br />the downstream resources until the completion of the impact statement <br />and the adoption of a new operating plan for the dam, in November 1991 <br />Reclamation implemented interim operating criteria, The interim <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />GAOIRCED-97-12 Glen Canyon Dam's Environmenta.llmpa.ct Statement <br />