Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, -'-~ <br /> <br />., <br />.,.t ~ <br />.,!.:..:,~,:i";';';' <br /> <br />. " ", -. . <br />.~>:<~:\,~:; ;:<;: :_"':~\;~:;:~";,~~'~ :~-~)[.~~.~.:dlki:~ftj:~ij~)i:~~t~~,:;)<~.; .~.:~:,. .~~~J,:'~;~'~.,:_~: .'. <br /> <br />,,_...,.., -.-- <br /> <br />':,,', <br />. ~,I~.- ~ ',':. <br /> <br />-;. <br /> <br />_:._.". <br /> <br />District and the Bureau. to affirm the fact it would <br />be financially necessary' for the Bureau and the Dis- <br />trict to construct the Proposed Conduits. <br /> <br />In the Section "Fryingpan.Arkensas Project", <br />reference was made to the necessity to obtain Congres- <br />sional and Administration Reauthorization approval <:".:) <br />of the Project due to projected increased costs, and r:") <br />the construction of the second 100 magawatt unit. ...... <br />During the Course of the Hearings before the Senate CX'J <br />and House Commi!tees! the Secretary of Interior, and 00 <br />the Commissioner of Reclamation, recommended that W <br />the two Proposed Municipal Pipelines be withheld from <br />Project construction until a second Economic Feasibi- <br />lity Study could be made. to determine whether or <br />not the entities were capable of constructing the Pipe- <br />lines themselves. The District objected to the Pro- <br />posal, and the Congress kept the Pipelines in. How- <br />ever, the District determined it necessary that an Eco- <br />nomic Study be done, and on September 19, 1974, re- <br />tained the Firm of C. H. Hoper and AS!5ociates. of <br />Denver, Colorado~ to perfect a Two Phase Feasibility <br />Study. The First was on the Proposed Pipeline from <br />Canon City to the Colorado Springs, Widefield, Foun. <br />tain, Security and Stratmoor Hills area; and the Sec- <br />ond on the - Proposed Conduit between Pueblo and <br />Lamar. Mr. Hoper conducted exhaustive Economic <br />Studies with all entitles involved, and during the same <br />period the members of the Board of Directors of the <br />District approved a Tentative Agreement setting forth <br />the amounts of water to be allocated to both Pipelines, <br />thus enabling the Bureau of Reclamation and Hoper to <br />determine ultimate costs of the Pipelines and water. <br />The five entities to be served by the Fountain Valley <br />Pipeline also entered into a Working Organization to <br />construct a Water Treatment Pla.nt independent -from <br />the costs of the Pipeline. It is the hope of the District <br />that the First Phase Report will be completed in Feb. <br />ruary 1975, for tran!5mittal to the Secretary of In- <br />terior. <br /> <br />During 1974 Officials from the District held <br />many meetings with various GQvernmental Agencies <br />in Washington, D. C. to determine whether alternate <br />methods of financing would be available for the Pro- <br />posed Arkansas Valley Conduit to include one or more <br />Treatment Plants between Pueblo and Lamar, to treat <br />not only Project water but also the total water supply. <br />It was hoped this could be accomplished under the <br />Rural Development Act 01 1972. A meeting 01 in. <br />terested Officials was held in Las Animas, Colorado, <br />July 17, under the auspices of the Lower Arkansas <br />Valley Council of Government, and after a detailed <br />explanation of the various alternatives by representa- <br />ti\'es from the Engineering Firm of Black and Veatch, <br />District Officials and the Bureau of Reclamation, it <br />was agreed the entities preferred a single Pipeline <br />from a Treatment Plant in Pueblo, rather than the <br />complicated and very expensive alternatives. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />COOPERATIVE STUDIES <br /> <br />The District has been an active participant in <br />Cooperative Studies with the U. S. Geological Survey, <br />State Engineer's Office. Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board, and Prhrate Consulting Firms, for a number <br />of years, with the full expectation that all accumulated <br />data would be available to the District and to all water <br />users within the boundaries of the District, in develop- <br />ment of workable Management Programs. Of great <br />importance to all \\-'ater users, and Official State and <br />National Agencies, is the Computer Program which <br />has been developed over a period of 12 years, Clnd <br />which identifies the complicated inter-relationship be- <br />tween surface and ground water. Studies have also <br />been completed identifying the Transportation Time <br />and Transit Loss between Twin Lakes and Pueblo, and <br />a Study is currently underway to determine the same <br />characteristics of the River between Pueblo and John <br />Martin. These elements are essential to manage waters <br />in the River. Ground Water Studies are being con- <br />ducted in the Wet Mountain Valley, the Upper Arkan. <br />sas Valley, Fountain Valley and Tributaries, to Pro- <br />gram a Total Water Regime in the Basin. Private En- <br />gineering Studies were conducted for the District by <br />world famous Horticulturists and Hydrologists rela- <br />tive to the water reqirements for various forms of <br />vegetation and other habitat. Copies of all Reports <br />have been made available to members of the Colorado <br />General Assembly, Courts of Law, Official Water <br />Agencies and to owners of adjudicated decrees. A <br />complete Water Management Program is critical to <br />the District in its long-range Management of Frying- <br />pan-Arkansas Project and other waters available to <br />it. <br /> <br />OFI'ICIAL WATER MEETINGS <br /> <br />The District is necessarily involved in Local, <br />Statel Regional, Basin and National Resource Manage- <br />ment Programs, and it is thereby necessary that rep- <br />resentatives be active in a number of Water Resource <br />Associations. The Board of Directors adopted a Policy <br />several years ago encouraging individual members of <br />the Board to attend' various Meetings, Symposiums, <br />Workshops and Tours, to gather information and data <br />to be used by the B('ard in long-range planning. As a <br />result of this responsibility~ representatives from the <br />District have testified before the Congress of the <br />United States and the Colorado General Assembly; <br />actively participated in activities of the Water Re- <br />sources Congress, National Water Resources Associa- <br />tion, Colorado River Water Users Association, Four <br />States Irrigation Council, Arkansas River Ba!5in Inter. <br />state Committee, Arkansas Basin Development Associa- <br />tion~ Colorado Water Congress, Colorado Water Con- <br />servation Board, Fry-Ark Operating Principles Com- <br />mittee, Colorado River Advisory Committee, Arkansas <br />River Compact Administration,' National Water Com- <br /> <br />....... <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />'-''':~o:o,~''--:;.:'7,-"::.".-. <br />