<br />, -'-~
<br />
<br />.,
<br />.,.t ~
<br />.,!.:..:,~,:i";';';'
<br />
<br />. " ", -. .
<br />.~>:<~:\,~:; ;:<;: :_"':~\;~:;:~";,~~'~ :~-~)[.~~.~.:dlki:~ftj:~ij~)i:~~t~~,:;)<~.; .~.:~:,. .~~~J,:'~;~'~.,:_~: .'.
<br />
<br />,,_...,.., -.--
<br />
<br />':,,',
<br />. ~,I~.- ~ ',':.
<br />
<br />-;.
<br />
<br />_:._.".
<br />
<br />District and the Bureau. to affirm the fact it would
<br />be financially necessary' for the Bureau and the Dis-
<br />trict to construct the Proposed Conduits.
<br />
<br />In the Section "Fryingpan.Arkensas Project",
<br />reference was made to the necessity to obtain Congres-
<br />sional and Administration Reauthorization approval <:".:)
<br />of the Project due to projected increased costs, and r:")
<br />the construction of the second 100 magawatt unit. ......
<br />During the Course of the Hearings before the Senate CX'J
<br />and House Commi!tees! the Secretary of Interior, and 00
<br />the Commissioner of Reclamation, recommended that W
<br />the two Proposed Municipal Pipelines be withheld from
<br />Project construction until a second Economic Feasibi-
<br />lity Study could be made. to determine whether or
<br />not the entities were capable of constructing the Pipe-
<br />lines themselves. The District objected to the Pro-
<br />posal, and the Congress kept the Pipelines in. How-
<br />ever, the District determined it necessary that an Eco-
<br />nomic Study be done, and on September 19, 1974, re-
<br />tained the Firm of C. H. Hoper and AS!5ociates. of
<br />Denver, Colorado~ to perfect a Two Phase Feasibility
<br />Study. The First was on the Proposed Pipeline from
<br />Canon City to the Colorado Springs, Widefield, Foun.
<br />tain, Security and Stratmoor Hills area; and the Sec-
<br />ond on the - Proposed Conduit between Pueblo and
<br />Lamar. Mr. Hoper conducted exhaustive Economic
<br />Studies with all entitles involved, and during the same
<br />period the members of the Board of Directors of the
<br />District approved a Tentative Agreement setting forth
<br />the amounts of water to be allocated to both Pipelines,
<br />thus enabling the Bureau of Reclamation and Hoper to
<br />determine ultimate costs of the Pipelines and water.
<br />The five entities to be served by the Fountain Valley
<br />Pipeline also entered into a Working Organization to
<br />construct a Water Treatment Pla.nt independent -from
<br />the costs of the Pipeline. It is the hope of the District
<br />that the First Phase Report will be completed in Feb.
<br />ruary 1975, for tran!5mittal to the Secretary of In-
<br />terior.
<br />
<br />During 1974 Officials from the District held
<br />many meetings with various GQvernmental Agencies
<br />in Washington, D. C. to determine whether alternate
<br />methods of financing would be available for the Pro-
<br />posed Arkansas Valley Conduit to include one or more
<br />Treatment Plants between Pueblo and Lamar, to treat
<br />not only Project water but also the total water supply.
<br />It was hoped this could be accomplished under the
<br />Rural Development Act 01 1972. A meeting 01 in.
<br />terested Officials was held in Las Animas, Colorado,
<br />July 17, under the auspices of the Lower Arkansas
<br />Valley Council of Government, and after a detailed
<br />explanation of the various alternatives by representa-
<br />ti\'es from the Engineering Firm of Black and Veatch,
<br />District Officials and the Bureau of Reclamation, it
<br />was agreed the entities preferred a single Pipeline
<br />from a Treatment Plant in Pueblo, rather than the
<br />complicated and very expensive alternatives.
<br />
<br />17
<br />
<br />COOPERATIVE STUDIES
<br />
<br />The District has been an active participant in
<br />Cooperative Studies with the U. S. Geological Survey,
<br />State Engineer's Office. Colorado Water Conservation
<br />Board, and Prhrate Consulting Firms, for a number
<br />of years, with the full expectation that all accumulated
<br />data would be available to the District and to all water
<br />users within the boundaries of the District, in develop-
<br />ment of workable Management Programs. Of great
<br />importance to all \\-'ater users, and Official State and
<br />National Agencies, is the Computer Program which
<br />has been developed over a period of 12 years, Clnd
<br />which identifies the complicated inter-relationship be-
<br />tween surface and ground water. Studies have also
<br />been completed identifying the Transportation Time
<br />and Transit Loss between Twin Lakes and Pueblo, and
<br />a Study is currently underway to determine the same
<br />characteristics of the River between Pueblo and John
<br />Martin. These elements are essential to manage waters
<br />in the River. Ground Water Studies are being con-
<br />ducted in the Wet Mountain Valley, the Upper Arkan.
<br />sas Valley, Fountain Valley and Tributaries, to Pro-
<br />gram a Total Water Regime in the Basin. Private En-
<br />gineering Studies were conducted for the District by
<br />world famous Horticulturists and Hydrologists rela-
<br />tive to the water reqirements for various forms of
<br />vegetation and other habitat. Copies of all Reports
<br />have been made available to members of the Colorado
<br />General Assembly, Courts of Law, Official Water
<br />Agencies and to owners of adjudicated decrees. A
<br />complete Water Management Program is critical to
<br />the District in its long-range Management of Frying-
<br />pan-Arkansas Project and other waters available to
<br />it.
<br />
<br />OFI'ICIAL WATER MEETINGS
<br />
<br />The District is necessarily involved in Local,
<br />Statel Regional, Basin and National Resource Manage-
<br />ment Programs, and it is thereby necessary that rep-
<br />resentatives be active in a number of Water Resource
<br />Associations. The Board of Directors adopted a Policy
<br />several years ago encouraging individual members of
<br />the Board to attend' various Meetings, Symposiums,
<br />Workshops and Tours, to gather information and data
<br />to be used by the B('ard in long-range planning. As a
<br />result of this responsibility~ representatives from the
<br />District have testified before the Congress of the
<br />United States and the Colorado General Assembly;
<br />actively participated in activities of the Water Re-
<br />sources Congress, National Water Resources Associa-
<br />tion, Colorado River Water Users Association, Four
<br />States Irrigation Council, Arkansas River Ba!5in Inter.
<br />state Committee, Arkansas Basin Development Associa-
<br />tion~ Colorado Water Congress, Colorado Water Con-
<br />servation Board, Fry-Ark Operating Principles Com-
<br />mittee, Colorado River Advisory Committee, Arkansas
<br />River Compact Administration,' National Water Com-
<br />
<br />.......
<br />
<br />18
<br />
<br />'-''':~o:o,~''--:;.:'7,-"::.".-.
<br />
|